Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01

I support adoption of this document which is going to help the IP solution provider and DHCP vendors to facilitate inter-operations.

And I also suggest the authors see RFC 7128 (RPKI Router Implementation Report) which offers a good example to follow in terms of 'Current DHCPv6 Server Software Cases’. 

Di

> 在 2019年4月19日，03:36，Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> 写道：
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This message initiates a three weeks long DHC WG adoption call on:
> 
> Title: Problem Statement of Multi-requirement Extensions for DHCPv6
> Pages: 11
> Date: 2019-03-10
> Document: draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01
> Link:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01
> 
> Please respond by May 9th.
> 
> This document has been presented several times in DHC. In Prague it was
> presented again and there was a reasonable interest in the room.
> If you support this document to be adopted, please say so. If you don't,
> say so as well (and preferably explain your objections).
> 
> Note to people who voiced support for this work in Prague - it is
> necessary to confirm your support on the mailing list.
> 
> Bernie & Tomek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 

Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01 - respond by May 9th