Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 13 September 2012 03:05 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A53C21F850D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BZe40fIdoqAY for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A0421F84FE for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2054; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1347505506; x=1348715106; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=pUqoqhNi4KR1aZCiE9gDnhFn70IM398BtQYjfxubAQE=; b=Np+RTywMmOuqDkhIoRnS/7Tm4A4McKln0uUzbediM7RSVtaIxm746RU1 kPJGrNCR/1sDYLDJD3CpqCAo3qfb6k8pCaSJKhPXSRLn7+Ou3UH6o2Uih ZX7MRz7QQcXAPzugH3TRjnXDY/TX3IwIpnp2q+WduuLiGGjr8XFlmVhUX c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFADJNUVCtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABCA7tygQeCIAEBAQMBAQEBDwEnMQMLBQcEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQcnCxQJCAIEAQ0FCBqHZQYLm1WgOYsQgx6CRGADpBWBaYJmghc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,413,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="121029341"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2012 03:05:06 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8D356OY022840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:05:06 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.159]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:05:05 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>, Wuyts Carl <carl.wuyts@technicolor.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT
Thread-Index: AQHNkR0BaQGOcCBbNkS5TFR4leqD8ZeHlYhA
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:05:04 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4FDE8B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <867F4B6A1672E541A94676D556793ACD16E4DC56E6@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> <BD87928F6BFAEF4EBEB883E1C4F587723023AB16@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <BD87928F6BFAEF4EBEB883E1C4F587723023AB16@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.254.215]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19180.000
x-tm-as-result: No--43.892100-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:05:07 -0000
Option numbers are assigned once the IESG has approved the document for publication (IANA then does its work). This isn't yet an IESG work item (it is still an individual submission, not even a WG document). Not really sure what the hold-up is as I thought this was pretty cut and dry. RFC 3315 actually permits early assignment (Section 24), so not sure if the DHC WG wants to consider that approach if this case: New DHCP option codes are tentatively assigned after the specification for the associated option, published as an Internet Draft, has received expert review by a designated expert [11]. The final assignment of DHCP option codes is through Standards Action, as defined in RFC 2434 [11]. - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brzozowski, John Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:29 PM To: Wuyts Carl Cc: dhc WG Subject: Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Carl, I do not think this is possible, I will check and get back to you unless someone beats me to it on the list. John ========================================= John Jason Brzozowski Comcast Cable m) +1-609-377-6594 e) mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com o) +1-484-962-0060 w) http://www.comcast6.net ========================================= On Sep 4, 2012, at 7:08 AM, Wuyts Carl wrote: > All, > > Anyone an idea when an option number will be assigned for this oro (as it still says TBD in below draft) ? > (I-D.droms-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update) > > Thx and regs > Carl > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Wuyts Carl
- Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Brzozowski, John
- Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Wuyts Carl
- Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Brzozowski, John
- Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT Wuyts Carl