Re: [dhcwg] MTU option for DHCPv6?

Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com> Thu, 28 July 2016 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3448412D197 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 01:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DW58Qy4_CICa for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 01:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9A7A12B024 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 01:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ians-mbp.lan ([62.225.30.139]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LdHqj-1b1uqD0vFR-00iW9J; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:49:16 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <f98d75f73d224798a406084fdb4cdedc@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:49:15 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F22A046E-27FA-4EED-9699-70A6B3D49A66@gmx.com>
References: <8c706ad593cc403d9e738c7aafec8360@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <5671d2f3bf364bec9b70ab8cbb9cd2a9@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9db5a86d50314519b4fcc4589717f802@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <f98d75f73d224798a406084fdb4cdedc@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5WcDduIpXQCwReaRA8BPcu/0JxB2PlCC+eqyxND0oCLzdlWUsw8 WdZI/zs5K/tGACb8k2eptHqTTpjFSwnQ9vaZY9S2hsvrnI4H3kfUZJuDNVdXEXQ//GKmrlO pv4pXBtvGng3BPcQsAAq2vQWiI8umyABXVpuEISFwsuTygTtSnT1VK6/o5ehvf8LK+j71Gi 4I13SMVMS5llO/cf3gZFw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:FHGpvH/T3Ks=:aolkalYs9FSus/1rz5u9m7 MgSmCuqRWBIWkgFaQ8rppsjSGT7qf0TNhV7Z7E5ynvb3pu90RV5Cdqqit55tYgrXR7xyYN/Sb dprB8kRjFjIpINdiysPt8yPNHF/Nnp20ihX1rXo2p3gMdWP19bktGd/izkGmrnwcefM0zGtef KFRsPQHvcgCiWsQi5vXRWdh5Hse6Luvf9KdsmJVlZENA5hUcCkRz03fGUsV9n4Z8yuEEDbZOM buoO4RAxKod7Jq3yTKSkpoqtTA+VRLtypIvSjlZwHTooP1VmlNikA7ZIhbS4FwbAOXqjsNnSO kcc3EqOxHJIIl1UfzVW83V9Hb2Xe1xM4/kcq7z9s1bfkLOdyN39N0lPdHsq++Yte0Qj3E5qQy Br0zXYxMlaGfxnpIRSXogK2h/SqNMnzBEsEyPOoDgAfKxkD0ha9Dn7ABunNNiQQ2tKLwKqla4 iNSRyI2bWmuX2qtLefvgBCuLgayPevQ/n4FAvgcWoiZaAyFCfr9w0Juhs/2QSjGnkwGXv5FNF hVj3vjRDFP+qSmWbZPQpPKQAjhuJzP7xVQC8SfuBOlMt/yeHOdtjnrJVWXYqyNzpBkg3Vy8Un +EVwmUlM2aAe1I2heRgBtaHu1m3+Tn+IN6FvGACmMPYDBp/O0Jvk9QcQJju9+sxEz6IItZaP5 rZl8q+ZKMicTk/9SW6UVolg68vDppI4WlJqUJPYSH+YpEKOOCnEUhMjtHik2PrlCBRHYVjrpQ xXyHpJkw8eRQ5d8EIy5z4ozyyVH03XQMYkKIyaVOCF3yDJPmdr/9+pundEr1Ciz2ARF1QRCrb P+87+nl
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/7l1ZPDnsQp7r8bu8-fnvjLiMjOQ>
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] MTU option for DHCPv6?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 08:49:32 -0000

Hi Bernie,

It sounds like Fred is looking for a DHCPv6 equivalent of DHCPv4 option 26 which (as I understand it) allows the DHCP server to tell the client the interface MTU to use on the link. Is this the same option as the one that you’re referring to?

I can also see a use for having this information being sent to the client as we plan to use large MTUs to clients. From my perspective, having this information inside the PIO would be most useful.

@Fred, if the MTU was carried as an option inside the PIO, and there was a way of putting the PIO into DHCP, would this work for you?


Ian


> On 28 Jul 2016, at 00:14, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure I fully follow.
> 
> The v4 MTU option is the client telling the server how much it can receive.
> 
> I'm not sure why the client wouldn't just use a large buffer (64K) as it isn't likely to need many of these buffers? The server is often more restrictive since it might be processing many requests at once.
> 
> And, why would you need to have the server send so much data that the client might not be able to receive it all?
> 
> BTW: I think when this came up during the writing of 3315, it was thought that having the client use a 64K buffer wasn't really an issue.
> 
> - Bernie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 5:24 PM
> To: Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com>om>; <dhcwg@ietf.org> <dhcwg@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: MTU option for DHCPv6?
> 
> Hi Bernie,
> 
> I'm operating on a link where I don't need to get any configuration information from RS/RA - everything comes from DHCPv6. So, ideally, I would like to see DHCPv6 provide an MTU option and a Prefix Information Option - then I would have everything I need so that I don't have to use a vendor-specific option. Would that be possible?
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bernie Volz (volz) [mailto:volz@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 2:02 PM
>> To: Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>om>; <dhcwg@ietf.org> 
>> <dhcwg@ietf.org>
>> Subject: RE: MTU option for DHCPv6?
>> 
>> Hi Fred:
>> 
>> Nothing has been proposed that I can recall. The issue really hasn't come up (to date).
>> 
>> - Bernie
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred 
>> L
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 4:10 PM
>> To: <dhcwg@ietf.org> <dhcwg@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [dhcwg] MTU option for DHCPv6?
>> 
>> Just curious - is there now (or has there ever been proposed) an MTU 
>> option for DHCPv6 in the same way that DHCPv4 has an MTU option?
>> 
>> Thanks - Fred
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg