Re: [dhcwg] draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Tue, 18 February 2014 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1C61A04FB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:42:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kjY9TxMYx2gk for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:42:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8821A0073 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:42:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3261; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1392741765; x=1393951365; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Srf4PHR7Lqv1M66iof8OjE8uxkBr0HnE8AxOa+L5wEc=; b=b/w09Z3bx4NhXrACVuwWui8bQueQeOCh5fAlWLZNo8trKARTgg14sXu4 idDrmPF+0m2f+5AUzmkdf1VICvDk6Wtll+nyV5dhXafMClJ2VTc3EOPv0 9Ah0M2hUxMKtX/vJJUQ6K4sZoBe0U1xqgD+Mz0Do0Q9kf4TY71my6YeOO c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFAHiMA1OtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZgwY4V79QgRoWdIIlAQEBBDo/DAQCAQgOAwECAQEBCxQJByERFAMGCAIEAQ0FCAGHaAMRDcN0DYgPF4xngUYSETEHBoMegRQElkCDHosshUWDLYFqQA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,502,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="304842563"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 16:42:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1IGgiSm026479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:42:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.99]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:42:44 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01
Thread-Index: AQHPK7/7Fij6BVIh0UG75m92ObJjVpq7MxuQ
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:42:43 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE99D3D@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <CADZyTkmKZnerSMJhZk3zv1MD1QG-AByL1aLcdGwT6Su1C-rpCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTk=W4W=JjrSO3OPf3_4VFB5mPV0-SkR6qa-J5fcYm_zb5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTk=W4W=JjrSO3OPf3_4VFB5mPV0-SkR6qa-J5fcYm_zb5w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.65.111]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/8Ak3eYl9oEgF8hnN9UjFjUjLQ5Q
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:42:49 -0000

Hi:

We will add it to the agenda, but it will be lower priority as it has not been adopted by the DHC WG and is apparently targeted for the HOMENET WG. At present, it looks like we will have time for it, but if not those interested can attend HOMENET.

Regards and see you in London!

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Migault [mailto:mglt.ietf@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 4:09 AM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Cc: Tomasz Mrugalski; Bernie Volz (volz)
Subject: Fwd: draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01

Hi,

If possible we would like to get a slot to present the DHCP Options we came to to configure the homenet naming architecture.

BR,
Daniel


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:37 PM
Subject: draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01
To: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>


Hi,

Please find the new version of the draft draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01. It defines DHCP Options to configure the Homenet naming architecture.

Feel free to comment!

BR,
Daniel

A new version of I-D, draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Daniel Migault and posted to the IETF repository.

Name: draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options
Revision: 01
Title: DHCP Options for Homenet Naming Architecture Document date: 2014-02-13
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 18
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/
Htmlized:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01
Diff:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mglt-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-01

Abstract:
   The home network naming architecture requires a complex naming
   configuration on the CPE.  This configuration MAY not be handled
   easily by the average end user.  Furthermore, such misconfiguration
   MAY result in making home network unreachable.

   This document proposes a DHCP options that provide the CPE all
   necessary parameters to set up the home network naming architecture.

   First, this DHCP options provide automatic configuration and avoid
   most end users' misconfiguration.  Most average end users may not
   require specific configuration, and their ISP default configuration
   MAY fully address their needs.  In that case, the naming homenet
   architecture configuration will be completely transparent to the end
   users.  Then, saving naming configuration outside the CPE, makes it
   resilient to change of CPE or CPE upgrades.  Such configuration may
   also be configured by the end user, via the customer area of their
   ISP.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat



--
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58


--
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58