Re: [dhcwg] RFC3315 DECLINE definition

Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <akostur@incognito.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5459E129DF2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:58:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=incognito-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlnd7rn6goQy for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:58:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x235.google.com (mail-yb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10DB129DD4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:58:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id j82so15505726ybg.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:58:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=incognito-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6Q+U1J8jrVyJSJr6kmqPv3mdZXCOR3fybpPCzVKYe2k=; b=2Qpi1OR+J1ooyBNE/mnBrjckEy2KYC71NO+evdQapD9VlimoC1FI4gZJsIvf6FjNbz DPAAHqJ/kD5gl5Bh+tU/+AMHs/6tMQmbvSsapN96FYtPRJMafehX1rmu2fe5JnWjo+Qx vd8gr2BQ02te+CBQtbxwDkgFptJhYAVfKDHKnR/o0Rl0ZqHjrs/MeI/Y+DUGCpCZJFVr 5TmsjSWixzsm7FTpug8ZCA5f0n2z9prvov8b3qrKVfEjToKdWbNhHQeb+7ltBRSZUYRe +KieiM3iCTlWM0yYg++9hKCLfcRo+R75mGWyuzR+x6a4YaRkPpFMXD98aTaR/oGOPtid xAvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6Q+U1J8jrVyJSJr6kmqPv3mdZXCOR3fybpPCzVKYe2k=; b=Atr+TowdXhO/6vl/9cebjDH6tGxyXvYeXVosDqIHZLaXeNE5zFgUwef8E2LsfQNdVc tTKqw34hOSvFqLV3iDTXbKI+4TVPzxXsUlpx1c7Jdfpxtcu/AvPw4Y1V7J/HTKZJmFl4 xpgSvHXdoUS+gYzY7N++JK0EcWaSVPHcYHO2lsj32J3ufFGIN1BODizZZDPO2ZV88r8y IjGlBy+tetRRX67nKPPCpmHTZ4v+qhJyZ4+JuvZwyfKLWT5L8A9VTbvwNCstsoCz+IMp UtsyIoN6f41YqkNPWQ9GxuLQkWaRaxr+wf4biIlRciHtFCJJ7UIF7DoFGz04ZifHtjQN bnhg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mmxM1zuzlb1D1SK1PORGtamIQopwN6HF6xNertwlB8q6lb61WA3yBaOhdAKij/iEuExQP4j587kPL1+0i1
X-Received: by 10.37.161.2 with SMTP id z2mr7750116ybh.50.1486763931951; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:58:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.113.5 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:58:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1924E@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
References: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA186B9@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <531b6fa753a441c19f1d47958f20b659@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18717@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <240e4b5573614422a42abec328872c0b@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18746@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <fd3365190bd445b1ad00a7d8043530dd@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA188B2@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <6792EF5E-8C1F-4D3B-BC6D-8D2EA011BF31@cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1890A@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <36880D80-601D-42BF-92F1-3E1B3A59A8FD@cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1892A@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <15160861-4D37-4A5E-900A-8AD688218EEF@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1898F@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <C16D3614-AD9E-4AB3-915B-5288DB0EB239@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA189BD@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA189F9@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <A3AFA8FF-FDEF-4058-814A-E687D5CC2969@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18ABB@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <A023117A-2B06-4660-88B9-9AB183F05B66@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18B12@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <B2511278-5D7A-40E0-AC4A-60784C101A80@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18B5E@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <36E8C88B-82EA-41FE-AB55-55F9CD110664@thehobsons.co.uk> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18ED6@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <CAL10_BqFTSbhe6krvTUz1VnLw0pQGodPRrt8c39sNcMhRUqvQw@mail.gmail.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1906F@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <CAL10_BorkqQXZUOFWarj_+275u1z9L9Xtkse=RQjGnOeFveNJg@mail.gmail.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA19187@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <CAL10_Bpy+4Eb4wUwuy5YkKaOO+69o0Ombej7n_ApCg1Gw-r0QQ@mail.gmail.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1924E@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:58:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL10_Bpb2eXAmnAnGpAeURMuqxBE=G+zYN+n1b1xk0qamtaU+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)" <dmudric@avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/9OcZqZ7PJhb27DT7V9nUI4lii1g>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] RFC3315 DECLINE definition
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:58:54 -0000

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)
<dmudric@avaya.com> wrote:
> The last question:
> If REBIND offers a new address and the client decides not to use it, does the serer need to know that? Should the client send DECLINE or RELEASE?

That depends.  Did the client detect that the new address is in use by
another node?  DECLINE (s18.1.7).   Otherwise, RELEASE (s18.1.6).

-- 
Andre Kostur