Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 and IPv6ND

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D561D1273E2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:02:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgIPwl5Nm5w2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:02:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com (mail-pg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181D51271FD for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id z184so13489461pgd.13 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:02:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=H6jJO2MZMFztHItbO9FhE7aIIUbew7wvHelurMHq0ZA=; b=dbNzO4SpZd7AZKgakgD6enO8TjpjRzLyMneivl73i23pj+v/zkI3ID1ilZgn89iKUh 5vUsNhHncIDIBRTnMASfYLuBzQPegOOFNkDR3/piOeyvUfW+De5aE814Ae7Z8inraZeL G1ldBxCcCcQ259VTGfLRS9wkgx2Hx6HnVAAs781owRyikljq/1t1tRLSbVs/JYgmMG/u IAfPIRIi5I3cj2UXJeorMbQi2BXydZU/nBsaDfQJ+xwxqOXe5mz38bqBMehMXuE/Rt/7 PFPslpPxodV25cnEFWm/0LMc06U50CjdCP0nq7lVBylnkUBs5JQzq8tj6GzMSbUVtJEG fuww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=H6jJO2MZMFztHItbO9FhE7aIIUbew7wvHelurMHq0ZA=; b=Dg90BDiQXjICUh3A2PsiO4E6Ax2Sqhe3GiKtgOxlJC7avsl85Ta3PnRmnO4PhOqU4j aYj5IkhCn7UBcRr04d7h9OzZVkLPNaswQ/kuxL9uXE0pi4hgdlvlTMupY/tnUgrpXD2S r2FuVgbF8Ibj/V7IAy88SlbhlOJRJM9RhpKgttD1tFfRGZJ3mpcFffGBFPRBLEN3SQ/6 bCvQsFZLp9jdfuNmEMW95XqoU6QBUBCOx6dE03KqYm95DCd21LJxE/CDyLfEjLPvrPqG eb2FJCCbwWhwzXz7WrV+q3T3gKut14eGbE0iTEfTe9gFr70SCBLa03pLntqZr0ek/g2e qi3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6sdYfmE8dJ8ajpIqw8iU7/gkK8a2stcHmsqMM8G6WAjAAH2a3D RC4YC/Y4flUzTgbxoHxnFLc/Eg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbxBTqAAIOYKRdvokE56bXuHiwC1m8lrNMIspjTvjalaitMea9qigLP1XyBeMHW8mJ4ccntaQ==
X-Received: by 10.159.202.130 with SMTP id p2mr13552901plo.309.1510779755241; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.43.27] ([111.65.61.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p77sm23829206pfd.132.2017.11.15.13.02.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:02:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <2907A64D-BB00-4922-BA6F-AA596AC878AB@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F586CFFF-3649-458E-A464-915D38CF103F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 05:02:27 +0800
In-Reply-To: <c1209cd5-270e-63fe-8d78-c6371f9f56ef@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <cf2e41a05fd742a3b576ee317c5392f6@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <E94F8CD6-EC4E-4B61-92B6-99FBD1D494A4@fugue.com> <8d935331012947aa942e8dc2a48d889f@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <54D1B686-A5FA-42A0-8A57-067562313488@fugue.com> <38ef2544-df5c-4677-ffaa-7b084eb300fa@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1k7CBvTOHFFoNeS6TMq_dkvSQTJ4TXR=Yt8S-6p--eabg@mail.gmail.com> <e4df5049-2548-6762-994d-a12c8f663e59@gmail.com> <8E4C374A-DA6D-4FAB-AAEA-7EB4A2A655D8@fugue.com> <68a1f0db-58d3-fe0e-8169-127c0b629df1@gmail.com> <89CE6E3F-7501-4A8D-9A1B-5638A8845E7D@fugue.com> <7ef058e6-0360-f86c-b7d8-8eaf129a7f95@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=o+N64kdoYSSG38rwazAj_Lj9xLUV4uDCAzxbcpref1g@mail.gmail.com> <d194e3a4-620f-dde3-c836-3b5122d2805b@gmail.com> <FA0DADA0-CD16-4538-9E71-19922AD106B9@cisco.com> <c1209cd5-270e-63fe-8d78-c6371f9f56ef@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/9ff_SPZGIa0RUJcbVkvJWFWfUCA>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 and IPv6ND
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:02:38 -0000

On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:36 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I would like to ask you: if no such modem exist on the market, why not modifying the DHCPv6 protocol to work on non-547 ports and on unicast?

Hm, well, as a practical matter, you can already do that.   Updating the protocol spec to do that seems bogus, though.   What happens if you just use a different port number on the phone and on the server, and use unicast?