Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)

Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mferguson@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DDC129C13 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vH6nyBh8G_d9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B3812EA8C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D971C1B1A; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u3EYSDLRQ7fZ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.11] (cpe-76-168-191-223.socal.res.rr.com [76.168.191.223]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 236AC1C1B14; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C90BC64-08D9-432E-B16E-0A3C59ADFCE1@kaloom.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:16:29 -0700
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "davidmiles@google.com" <davidmiles@google.com>, "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com>, "James.Bristow@swisscom.com" <James.Bristow@swisscom.com>, "roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it" <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, "niels@qacafe.com" <niels@qacafe.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9A5F946F-C968-49AE-A6E7-F24608AEB3BE@amsl.com>
References: <20170414185617.0DC8FB813F0@rfc-editor.org> <1BDC18F7-878D-4B77-A43E-6B87204C77F3@cisco.com> <3C90BC64-08D9-432E-B16E-0A3C59ADFCE1@kaloom.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/9hm-OnYWjh2aYDXLB4jCjP2iQOc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:50:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:16:36 -0000

Hi Suresh,

Just forwarding this message from Amanda at IANA for FYI as I see you were not CC’d.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-issues-comment@iana.org>
>> Subject: [IANA #957997] [IANA] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6704 (4995)
>> Date: April 18, 2017 at 2:16:19 PM PDT
>> Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, volz@cisco.com, terry.manderson@icann.org
>> Reply-To: iana-issues-comment@iana.org
>> 
>> Hi Bernie,
>> 
>> Megan forwarded us this note about errata 4995.
>> 
>> Because the IANA Considerations section specifically says that the entry in the length field is "1," and it's an IETF Consensus registry, we would need an AD-verified errata report in order to change the length to "n." We'll add a link to the errata report to the reference field when we make the change.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Amanda Baber
>> Lead IANA Services Specialist



On Apr 19, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:

> Hi Bernie,
>  I will try to figure out how to do the IANA update. I will hold onto the erratum until then.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:36 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This erratum is verified. Please update it to reflect that is verified.
>> 
>> We can then notify IANA to have the table corrected.
>> 
>> - Bernie Volz
>> 
>> On 4/14/17, 2:56 PM, "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>> 
>>   The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6704,
>>   "Forcerenew Nonce Authentication".
>> 
>>   --------------------------------------
>>   You may review the report below and at:
>>   http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6704&eid=4995
>> 
>>   --------------------------------------
>>   Type: Technical
>>   Reported by: Niels Widger <niels@qacafe.com>
>> 
>>   Section: 4
>> 
>>   Original Text
>>   -------------
>>      IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv4 option code from the
>>      registry "BOOTP Vendor Extensions and DHCP Options" maintained at
>>      http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters:
>> 
>>      Tag: 145
>> 
>>      Name: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE
>> 
>>      Data length: 1
>> 
>>      Description: Forcerenew Nonce Capable
>> 
>>      Reference: this document
>> 
>>   Corrected Text
>>   --------------
>>      IANA has assigned the following new DHCPv4 option code from the
>>      registry "BOOTP Vendor Extensions and DHCP Options" maintained at
>>      http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters:
>> 
>>      Tag: 145
>> 
>>      Name: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE
>> 
>>      Data length: n
>> 
>>      Description: Forcerenew Nonce Capable
>> 
>>      Reference: this document
>> 
>>   Notes
>>   -----
>>   RFC 6704 Section 3.1.1 states that the FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option is variable length and contains a list of algorithm types:
>> 
>>   The FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE option contains code 145, length n, and
>>      a sequence of algorithms the client supports:
>> 
>>                Code   Len   Algorithms
>>               +-----+-----+----+----+----+
>>               | 145 |  n  | A1 | A2 | A3 | ....
>>               +-----+-----+----+----+----+
>> 
>>                    Figure 1: FORCERENEW_NONCE_CAPABLE Option
>> 
>>   Instructions:
>>   -------------
>>   This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>   use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>   rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
>>   can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>> 
>>   --------------------------------------
>>   RFC6704 (draft-ietf-dhc-forcerenew-nonce-07)
>>   --------------------------------------
>>   Title               : Forcerenew Nonce Authentication
>>   Publication Date    : August 2012
>>   Author(s)           : D. Miles, W. Dec, J. Bristow, R. Maglione
>>   Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>   Source              : Dynamic Host Configuration
>>   Area                : Internet
>>   Stream              : IETF
>>   Verifying Party     : IESG
>> 
>> 
>