Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-6man-default-iids Section 4 & 6.9 (DHCPv6)

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 21 July 2016 08:58 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113F312B017; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 01:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qQlESmQ6lo3; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 01:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ADBC12D0AC; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 01:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2554; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469091522; x=1470301122; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=HYUTTTfYvfwC3Wu+RvDT89Qg7DqdxzWvifEVZEFWlFM=; b=jvde2XxKMD3I1ekzACACCxhIkEvYJGXEtE1TeFvhJYWj9bPWYi0oWJh7 g00MzGof5r3dK1EYIc3EY458paI+n0JMLWh/V95dyp24U+XX0DCUMSbTm hw7nzwCH8p4d6zfjhBWTsjIzRBznPCmU+wI2PbW79FwxRscM3PffbWBPa 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AlAgDxjZBX/5xdJa1dgz9WfAa4XIF7I?= =?us-ascii?q?oV4AhyBEDgUAQEBAQEBAWUcC4RdAQUBASEROgsQAgEIGAICJgICAiULFRACBA4?= =?us-ascii?q?FG4gVDq9OjWkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYEBiHOBA4QqBhCDAYJaA?= =?us-ascii?q?QSZJgGGFYhVjzqQIAEeNoILHIFMbgGGWH8BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,398,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="300428671"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jul 2016 08:58:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6L8wf97012248 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:58:41 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 03:58:40 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 03:58:40 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "otroan@employees.org" <otroan@employees.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-6man-default-iids Section 4 & 6.9 (DHCPv6)
Thread-Index: AQHR4yonS2aKHoWIFECnh5Wt1IH5QqAi5eGA///ArQA=
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:58:40 +0000
Message-ID: <D3B605F6.31290%volz@cisco.com>
References: <D3B60069.31262%volz@cisco.com> <43CE5CAD-2D98-4A75-BF33-E5B415B1013C@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <43CE5CAD-2D98-4A75-BF33-E5B415B1013C@employees.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.6.160626
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.251.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <57C0EB814611EF4F9F30A3FD65B1C5D4@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/9sOUQGJIUi5ku_IRgQSYRr5mgtQ>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-default-iids@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids@ietf.org>, "dhcpv6bis@ietf.org" <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-6man-default-iids Section 4 & 6.9 (DHCPv6)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:58:44 -0000

Ole:

(I fixed 6man mailing list address.)

That is probably the best solution and I would support that.

We can still discuss changing some of the text in 3315bis, but that can
then be done without 6man involvement. (We do still have the older text in
what is now Section 12.1 of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05, so should really
clean that up.)

- Bernie


On 7/21/16, 4:45 AM, "otroan@employees.org" <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

>Bernie, et al,
>
>The first line of the abstract says:
>   "This document changes the recommended default IID generation scheme
>   for cases where SLAAC is used to generate a stable IPv6 address."
>
>I'm not convinced that we need to have the DHCP paragraph there at all.
>Would that work for you?
>
>Best regards,
>Ole
>
>
>> On 21 Jul 2016, at 10:30, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Alissa, et al:
>> 
>> Based on a conversation between some of the draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis
>>coauthors and in the DHC WG session Wednesday (7/20) morning, we are not
>>in favor of the replacement text as it currently stands. We will work
>>something up and send it to you as soon as we can.
>> 
>> We are likely to simplify the replacement text to something like the
>>following (but this is only my proposal and has not been reviewed by
>>others):
>> 
>>     By default, DHCPv6 server implementations SHOULD NOT generate
>>     predictable IPv6 addresses ([RFC7721]). DHCPv6 servers SHOULD
>>     NOT assign addresses that use a reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier
>>     ([RFC5453], [RFC7136], and [IANARESERVEDIID]).
>> 
>> We are tracking this issue at
>>https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/ticket/166.
>> 
>> - Bernie
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>