Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Prague: SeDHCPv6

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 31 May 2017 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825C126D85 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p9mGEzh1If1f for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E43C12EA55 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id m17so18876946pfg.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IoB1+IRtwIt/zzw36Z2026j2bBF84mNFdkMBy6lX4nE=; b=1k+d6LUoJTZr6oZwenca0ue7cYxhQ28/KuE98eFwKRpUUE0Zg8bcZWAljy4tjlRfQb eX5XOpM4foUG2J5zun4KCQhuAVav77WVnZ4uIlvvl31tBvJ3CPWEdgyIm6k/UIHaIlX8 In8xaU2rSYfZ77D9Wmpc4f94kxHno+FnJsi22mvpNVfMSLm4GBRujZ+3d0TxkpzAl+0N AstweDDWawgi5P1oVUUuYn2ZpbOK4wG3U7RgrmAN8uJIv+rWaKKwMqFmTBaROiJMqY7M tFJyJ0BuFGPvPUo4KmlnM/Pb9sfi23aB5m9s4AknS/Fl6NgjbvNNurHKB/OFGuNd8MFQ Ncdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IoB1+IRtwIt/zzw36Z2026j2bBF84mNFdkMBy6lX4nE=; b=AZStSSR+julPzJFntGJzn2CRML/2LPkx0yIpA5QQswFEr08Pt/74GNS6xrLmRaxFf9 toZaClLlTkYgVPbAzwsMfvwNI+y3CZ1JPnYM1hODNyDDEPkKKkBclj9i2qacykSRUWcn egX9R6u+Hlp4qyXb6j9oH+plEs/wL4xb3K5Zn0R6Ckm9Uj9Sp8doDNl3RbEI19M6NXZx 4cRHhUla7mWRVdJygas+/kefrbjII1dibb0LD+DstPukOaOqmY0C+Dx9TlfwDGiCA+/y p9oW76YEfoKg+xNBK4FbI5YhpKN8S7BVsSBCR4ILFYdxgAdXonqJz4TMkWqv9NthDx4B 8jhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcD9XDQzJbqxMXlGqYw+tExFbCjM1uE9gwBqDnV1d3FSYRiOq3b8 j/Zzwxm+r4pElqCx62r65PJ22IuSBYEb
X-Received: by 10.98.153.153 with SMTP id t25mr33252314pfk.160.1496268124966; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.180.45 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.180.45 with HTTP; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqeE1y3MBSSptWbjEDPkq8LK7mi0sdVxxNUSMQFWX-cq7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C526A41E-9283-4D0F-88CA-EE8F61582D9D@cisco.com> <166ebb54-9a71-5bf9-669b-ff7be6f65ec7@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfT2nDLPsfGWC2-mKdL0QPB9Gc+bik3Gp1VCQWCcmrVRg@mail.gmail.com> <07525FFD-54C7-486E-B71C-9A282FD45967@fugue.com> <CAJE_bqeE1y3MBSSptWbjEDPkq8LK7mi0sdVxxNUSMQFWX-cq7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 18:02:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=qBFvfPaFuMO5iHMa+mf8ftHUfQZLct0+cyK511UimcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0ed79a13e7460550d91204"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/AFvKFUl-trNLGzDrjW4KDwK8-h4>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Prague: SeDHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 22:02:07 -0000

Ah, I see. Let me get back to you on that.  :)

On May 31, 2017 5:54 PM, "神明達哉" <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:

> At Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:55 -0400,
> Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>
> > This is only an issue if the transport can't handle packets larger
> > than 512 bytes.
>
> So are you suggesting we should divide large messages into multiple
> small chunks and encrypt them separately (and send the result in a
> single encapsulated DHCPv6 message)? (Asking just so I can understand
> it).
>
> --
> JINMEI, Tatuya
>