IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 18 October 2012 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6F621F8484 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uen9-lsoR+K9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og124.obsmtp.com (exprod7og124.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8419C21F842D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob124.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUIAqb1l182/kBiUMCAgy8AkHEDqMlJ8I@postini.com; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:12:31 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A497F1B8344 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA9419005C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:12:30 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt
Thread-Index: Ac2X8ddMOw/OIH/tQHCVi0DiBXN4ZAVjzfUAAAE/LwA=
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:12:30 +0000
Message-ID: <D543D271-0F88-42F1-A17A-FF389BC3FE2E@nominum.com>
References: <BF22E1BC-0E6B-4245-95C4-95E8B0F210B0@nominum.com> <7809F7E0-1EFD-491F-84AB-0F6DE8685927@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <7809F7E0-1EFD-491F-84AB-0F6DE8685927@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <939FEDA80F5AA34FA7E3948724E84BF9@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-client-link-layer-addr-opt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:12:32 -0000

On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> Well here it is, October 5, and it's time to evaluate consensus.   Oh wait, it's October 18.   But anyway, there were about ten participants in favor of advancing, and none opposed.   Two participants, Bernie and Tim, had suggestions to clarify the text.   Could the authors please sync up with Tim and Bernie to get those fixes in and then post an updated document?   Once we have the updated doc, I will submit a shepherd doc to the IESG.

The authors just submitted a new version which includes the change that Tim requested.   On reviewing the correspondence, I realized that Bernie and Bud eventually agreed that no change was required, and that was confirmed  in some private email from Guarav just now.   So I'll be writing up a shepherd doc and sending it along.   Thanks, everyone!

(Tim, if I'm mistaken, there's still time for you to object! :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email