IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-03 - Respond by Dec 2, 2013

Cong Liu <gnocuil@gmail.com> Wed, 04 December 2013 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <gnocuil@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938991ADF7C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:12:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-G6ftUkjIRL for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374E31ADF73 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r5so3271324qcx.28 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 01:12:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=bhBIdHhVVz/tMZY4nQ/RYgnyxuJvH5i983onrhefB64=; b=MaU94Dz7NJjtDYqc8GmjgOOAVKp7o2Xcgg5w/W92Mn0jW4bcqVnRRndyaErd78F+qv g9aOvQZhsW2117HC5xZfEHEbB3vFIVOa0z2ar6fGgQ1b2sUdbIN7fptAyv1NWjHoRbSt POPqUNpC/oaSMATUpsa6HitmKwap06ab2NkoYJgsTiJFcUOvM6FIhqjeDu4HadSIDQ9j Ru/k1u9RdPtzAvuc82n+41Tm8ZANTw8VsszYO4qsOy4Nzz2T5KTKxUZbkWX2st9D/KRN F+9IGD3nO09Z3rky5CCFlUuX2QZ6VtKohVTNb9Q7lA/irRoJO29kLnM/bw5B+JYsKuGc sFJw==
X-Received: by 10.49.15.202 with SMTP id z10mr112476932qec.46.1386148352134; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 01:12:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.161.103 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:12:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3E77E4ED-890B-4C09-A9AC-C458B6A07F7A@nominum.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD98DE0@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <529E383E.4050302@gmail.com> <3E77E4ED-890B-4C09-A9AC-C458B6A07F7A@nominum.com>
From: Cong Liu <gnocuil@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:12:11 +0800
Message-ID: <CAF+sHxHhSp-=P9E7NLWDsYi_0gy-Qha0GXNko+UVxJz_QrxPbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb03c8422948504ecb1d0e8"
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-03 - Respond by Dec 2, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:12:37 -0000

Dear all,

I support this document moving forward.

Best Regards,
Cong


2013/12/4 Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>

> By the way, I recently learned about this resource:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt
>
> This is a list of all the abbreviations the RFC editor is aware of, with
> the ones that need not be expanded marked with an asterisk.   DHCP is
> marked with an asterisk.   So you don't need to write it out—just write
> DHCP, and the reader is expected to know what it stands for.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email