IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28

Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Thu, 27 February 2014 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <kkinnear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352A91A0337 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:43:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cemXVGBW_Fqm for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F7E1A032E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:43:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2490; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393515779; x=1394725379; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JsFOndI0cJ2+RlFUJ7SX/BTEkesD0Eas51zX/43Yc3Y=; b=lQCrcLqwze4dLH4ow9FZmYO7M3vqUE0v4kUx0cqhLXPd72kkhtunAYoT W0jTldUtGNQf/pVD5d7pKkSru7gn6S1jQ36oO3oj7JDr7XNgrdNZ5Js02 4fKi8XrKmOc4B77GCdDlazgyMtkfrSqTUzEw/428f16lKpe9aVIj12AZw 8=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,555,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="306947174"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2014 15:42:59 +0000
Received: from [10.86.246.178] ([10.86.246.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1RFgvVn007362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:42:58 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AEAB9BF@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:42:57 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1CD2937E-5A0E-4BD9-AC15-51815EBE8DFB@cisco.com>
References: <52FA8A40.8020703@gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AEAB9BF@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Authenticated-User: kkinnear
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/B7HL5xySwrKFFcmEeOMsGBMAXRM
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:43:11 -0000

I wrote this draft, and believe that it should be moved forward.

I would sure appreciate some additional eyes on it if we elect to
move it forward, as I'm sure there are things that we've missed.

Regards -- Kim

On Feb 24, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> Reminder that this WGLC is outstanding.
> 
> We need feedback in order to determine whether to advance this document.
> 
> - Bernie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tomek Mrugalski
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:38 PM
> To: dhcwg
> Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
> 
> We have adopted two active leasequery drafts after Vancouver meeting.
> There was moderate interest in that work during adoption call, but we never saw any discussions about them on the ML. Since authors confidence in those proposals are high due to existing implementations, they have requested WGLC.
> 
> After a quick discussion between chairs, we have decided to go ahead with the WGLC, hoping that it will trigger some reviews and discussion.
> Please make no mistake - those drafts need reviews and comments. A simple "I support this" followed with couple +1s will not do do the trick here.
> 
> This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-00. Please send your comments by Feb. 28th. Note that although both documents are very similar, they are separate drafts and are going through separate WGLCs.
> If you support this work, make sure that you clearly state which draft (v4, v6 or both) you support. Each WGLC will be assessed independently.
> 
> Finally, I'd also remind you that we are looking for volunteers to do the shepherding work. Please let us know if you'd like to be a shepherd for one of those documents. It is not a difficult task, but some prior IETF experience is necessary. As a shepherd, you can get unique insight into the WGLC process and better exposure to how IESG works. Having such an experience can be useful with moving your own draft forward faster.
> 
> Bernie & Tomek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email