[dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01 summary - passed

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Wed, 14 December 2016 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F41294D2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:05:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UR80sNa5zHah for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:05:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 335771294B8 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:05:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id a197so132934917wmd.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:05:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z4+YpU8CxOy1/QWs08Z2iUPCH+20PJIgrd07gOL/tEs=; b=MAfPIzybU5/+jZ5DMD/dP7KN9c8p2vaWwPl+NCWj1ZXbpw28/MTWFNyNz4e6VV98mr GnxKFXbloAnGo1dgVeb2/8Tiz7ISr0F8duAHXR5GHT7Zh72RjCIGhnbpARBVhaNZAGy1 3KfZ5TFHKA7ufuEUEW07KUKMEgXpM7eSVdh52ZnkXrAavh+BcSN2EcN7ndyT9phQ0rLU tqsiWawga4tLpB6KG3mOLaCjWWNUDFlFOdD8bIya2SJbRc7Zi3Gyw9C0IDvc7N/cP/mT BQbpU7wK4QelKD2TXcjunHikV2CsUXqSQQYDt0haF878rl7w5bbD0onDd45i6xTmpojw UOOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z4+YpU8CxOy1/QWs08Z2iUPCH+20PJIgrd07gOL/tEs=; b=A9a59cEc+S6NnWCzzmL88Cgc9vN/JVLZkJYqJY9CeSX3EEgBBz9uJsbL2KPkpmsV5l UbmSbexKtp0109o15tO+j2WJQcKDqi7S7MOxX6H0ZXWVuIQ0zLr2A0PNqvotdNRgM4yH OLsWTFPHNQrV7FkMvFtpxNjQ8Bztz4mZPkGDIbAuOMmBmO+VaLxvBX0ip84Ga+5YX4bJ bB9ouLc9gUo45OIT6e8mOdT77t3OXQ3xru7kB+jnFyBFPbAo8SZabFps9PbpM7vjr4iX C4OQ88R+qswSmJjHsWNIpRTs5oisr8VGwiR46R1XVcZkgmyRI6eD5LjrBgL4XEki2SY2 /KCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00ZWqCFERlavOFJEiSGmz662toqxZ6wIqPN2zBg0YknxBkCFMykeeDoOU8q0k3cXw==
X-Received: by 10.28.30.207 with SMTP id e198mr9470094wme.74.1481749532608; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (109241207033.gdansk.vectranet.pl. [109.241.207.33]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l67sm9284591wmf.20.2016.12.14.13.05.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:05:32 -0800 (PST)
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <147671242179.4527.12337010225582460227.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7e03afc26a08461e8308d5bdf985bed9@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ccbfe561da43469e8f894e2235c4b429@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <6a8f5646aedb44b5af85d7a45039eb02@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <ed09c191c9a24989b38ec3db233e04d1@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CA+dB4X4edhyJa+FR8phiJvQqi1wPU+eqsZ4=b4WHL7mFj-Dkgw@mail.gmail.com> <6c57d13d-7f48-67b5-fdad-4f230f46553f@gmail.com>
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <093eae9a-7ff1-ed9b-d815-81a2f804138c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:05:30 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6c57d13d-7f48-67b5-fdad-4f230f46553f@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/B7_PGKLa5tS_m_X_V_pXQnHAb1w>
Cc: "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01 summary - passed
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:05:35 -0000

Hi,
Bernie is a co-author of this draft, so I was the person responsible for
determining consensus on this one. I was travelling recently, so it took
longer than usual. Sorry about that.

Anyway, this draft received several voices of support. Nobody objected
the draft moving forward. This topic was presented during two IETF
meetings (95 and 96) and got favourable reception in the room. The
response to this WGLC was smaller than usual, but this is a fairly
straight-forward draft. This draft is also addressing a specific issue
raised by IESG while reviewing another draft.

Given all of the above, I determined that the consensus is to move
forward with this draft once the comments raised during WGLC are
addressed. Authors, please publish updated rev when ready and confirm
with people who commented that their issues were addressed. I'll start
working on my shepherd write-up as soon as the new rev is published.

Tomek