[dhcwg] Results of WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A207712B034 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8CB9Yp9H74v for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50DC512B00D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13008; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464799665; x=1466009265; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=oYzjKrx3AxNkhu+ioU3TD94fR33/PaHyrArAn18co84=; b=P+6Iz/FQivAN9tQAjZIeM7kbRfeFcYXCGqSmZuDlJFPROlraODE2KDBo YQ1bfRRhr2IAa4+mziZ8YXcEPUKTvHP3AEAvUvNKCIurv1ItrpR/uTX8z BFf1hgMTc079z4k3rhXPWImoOnlWWqUSBp7clRsooDboXqSeUP+9AzvRO 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BFAgDKEE9X/40NJK1dgnBNVn0GqXmLH?= =?us-ascii?q?4Jqgg8BDYF6hhECgTI4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RFAQEFLV4BGQQBASg5FAkJAQQTCIg?= =?us-ascii?q?noCWhJQEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBAR+KdIR2hSQFmDcBgS6MaoFwhE+IZI9LAR4BA?= =?us-ascii?q?UKDbW6JOH8BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,402,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="279626002"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Jun 2016 16:47:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com []) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u51GliVc020010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:47:44 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ( by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:47:43 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:47:43 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "'dhcwg@ietf.org'" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Results of WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01
Thread-Index: AdG8ILaAmzrgAgFrQdOQbOoMLXNgRw==
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:47:43 +0000
Message-ID: <c6a02d7a00cb4f1faa22914a3cfd977f@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_c6a02d7a00cb4f1faa22914a3cfd977fXCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/B99yxQcNfiltMCI8_Dzc2DurIVE>
Subject: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:47:53 -0000

The results are a bit tardy ... sorry about that.

But sadly (as I need to make the call as Tomek is a co-author), I don't think we're ready to advance this document. We will try again and hopefully get some more participation.

Thanks to Tomek for posting thorough review comments.

Tomek has requested time in Berlin to discuss this work.

I propose that based on the outcome of the Berlin discussion, we may start another WGLC after that.

-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 8:52 AM
To: 'dhcwg@ietf.org' <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01 - Respond by May 22, 2016

Hi. This is a reminder about this WGLC.

-          Tomek & Bernie

From: Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 3:25 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01 - Respond by May 22, 2016

Hi all,

This message starts the DHC Working Group Last Call to advance draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01, DHCPv6 Failover Protocol. This document's intended status is Proposed Standard. At present, there is no IPR file against this document.

Please send your comments by May 22, 2016. If you do not feel this  document should advance, please state your reasons why.

We will need several serious reviews of this document for it to pass WGLC.

Bernie Volz is the assigned shepherd (Tomek is a co-author).

- Tomek & Bernie