Re: [dhcwg] RFC3315 DECLINE definition

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D021129BD4 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:39:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dI-jha2KNm3f for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350D8129BCF for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v23so9192114qtb.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:39:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=hCmP4JuAI9iBAVBAHJtPPkW1JkKX2BdmOZha2k2hFqk=; b=bGHIWNy0OK/ngahVkA+yw885d/9QrAS+ww4LGPYyH/vU7t0+GvWfG66s7ThKMQQYWl BfLuSmgr4PBAZb/ZnpUlbdZxqyzDUQxDWO8gc1SIGPMu3rbbcai3oLDYlIucY/zQjIrY C0nRIr+BljaEwSOZJiIfDiqb8U3IsjoODOAMGOfP4/Cm+wCgfFFVuHKmirYzgdtG6hC/ B0KH5WxRRojDAdWiaSbT5z8xQs6l5yltnPTEzufK5CB02ckWOTyEkFtG8sHz/uQG55W/ GL0K5zUb8Rr29ZFbqM/I/wU6nNMuXlQGWkFcyp1YLpiCnwsAfRYD1HECWjmmjWVKkH+X XWVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=hCmP4JuAI9iBAVBAHJtPPkW1JkKX2BdmOZha2k2hFqk=; b=rYIUYyB84SjUiio2FGSsL3QND5HxhVRRdrvyj4/kIW1YhMhV+jNOqd58DbEKkc1AND dFNUOM1v8wIJkrccUWCtmX8BEchu0p148EojDWEoCIJuCIccKxkPiQSSl22Ha+tfMeN5 HOWdLitjyGdhlqBVc0gzR5karXCDp4+11YSWWmnavWNmLJHayYgV1etMrHEY9BG/YAGU eMGOl04N7MOUb/q0l0Hlx+/g2wTJVxUIHge7RySQuNRsdFLGCAzgSvlAjh66v/MCC51Q V7uxB+1TajJ3w9FTZ4UqnOvmzSNMpK+74K2zabtrShY8qc9mO2xTQooTrWE3Z+qZseG5 nitQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k2f7tHBoJOGsNdehWBoXR/KokQK3Z2oZGc9lg2K60wPBR22j6RW3SJvdzSNEt79g==
X-Received: by 10.237.55.97 with SMTP id i88mr3984674qtb.143.1486658363395; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:39:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 23sm9559003qtp.20.2017.02.09.08.39.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 08:39:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <B2511278-5D7A-40E0-AC4A-60784C101A80@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_61EBD1F4-56B2-43E7-A300-0CAF5BFD2422"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:39:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18B12@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
To: "Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)" <dmudric@avaya.com>
References: <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA186B9@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <531b6fa753a441c19f1d47958f20b659@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18717@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <240e4b5573614422a42abec328872c0b@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18746@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <fd3365190bd445b1ad00a7d8043530dd@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA188B2@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <6792EF5E-8C1F-4D3B-BC6D-8D2EA011BF31@cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1890A@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <36880D80-601D-42BF-92F1-3E1B3A59A8FD@cisco.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1892A@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <15160861-4D37-4A5E-900A-8AD688218EEF@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA1898F@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <C16D3614-AD9E-4AB3-915B-5288DB0EB239@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA189BD@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <0540D77C-E307-4B96-A53B-81599408C8F7@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA189F9@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <A3AFA8FF-FDEF-4058-814A-E687D5CC2969@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18ABB@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com> <A023117A-2B06-4660-88B9-9AB183F05B66@fugue.com> <9142206A0C5BF24CB22755C8EC422E457AA18B12@AZ-US1EXMB03.global.avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/BN9efjFl6XM6Axl52Pn1zfKDRVw>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] RFC3315 DECLINE definition
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:39:25 -0000

On Feb 9, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Mudric, Dusan (Dusan) <dmudric@avaya.com> wrote:
> The application does the semantic check for the address and, if the address is semantically correct, checks if the device using the offered address can be reached within the domain the in which device has to communicate. If, for example, the device has to be globally reachable, the address has to be an unreserved, or not deprecated, global address.

OK.   Why can't the DHCP server do this validation?