IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-proxyserver-opt-00

"Richard Barr Hibbs" <rbhibbs@pacbell.net> Tue, 20 April 2004 19:21 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15733 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BG0Tr-0000Jj-41 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:00:27 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3KJ0RXO001183 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:00:27 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BG0Ro-0006qa-UK for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:58:20 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA12737 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:58:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BG0Rm-0000ea-4N for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:58:18 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BG0Qn-0000bI-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:57:18 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BG0QP-0000YM-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:56:53 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BG09B-0008Nv-Sn; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:39:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BG02V-0005cf-J3 for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:32:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA10533 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:32:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BG02S-0006MY-RL for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:32:08 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BG01V-0006IY-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:31:09 -0400
Received: from smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.84]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BG00a-0006Ea-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:30:13 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO BarrH63p601) (rbhibbs@pacbell.net@64.169.89.34 with login) by smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2004 18:22:20 -0000
Reply-To: rbhibbs@pacbell.net
From: Richard Barr Hibbs <rbhibbs@pacbell.net>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-proxyserver-opt-00
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:30:35 -0700
Message-ID: <EJEFKKCLDBINLKODAFMDKEKDDCAA.rbhibbs@pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040420111554.01f9f660@flask.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I support the proposed change to carry a list or servers
rather than multiple instances of a single-server-only
suboption

--Barr


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Droms
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2004 08:20
>
> Ted and I both made the same suggestion about
> carrying a list of servers in
> one instance of the suboption, rather than
> multiple instances of the same
> suboption each carrying one server.  Is this
> change acceptable to the WG
> (please respond yes or no)?
>
>


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email