[dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 19 July 2013 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2873D11E81E6 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XSzjR08hDySI for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A8011E8142 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7514; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1374242361; x=1375451961; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=DUTLNA6qS9SdcycvUrDjN7OUCyUo6jBraoZgizldcqc=; b=PVV1LpoLjGvBEhty052PccM9lRhr7CKptyHI1OC/USNmvTJ9z+kSWxrt ai97GqPibs48i+nzJAciSsKCgLgzkNOWE3tNaI+w5LQ6qtGsrZNnZs2CS pAj8hHgVl4xTsiYwSHq/rrjFTaEoVPsMRkHsl+dGvB62k53ETA1O3aSwh M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmAFAL1F6VGtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABbgkJENVC4Cog8gQ8WdIImAQQtXgEqViYBBBuICAyWQ6BJj16DSG4DmQaQJIMSgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,701,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="236927724"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Jul 2013 13:59:20 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6JDxK9i023916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:59:20 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.56]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:59:20 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!
Thread-Index: Ac6Eh+GxcVMnIa4YTCqgEkgg655xbg==
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:59:20 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E185ECB4B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.247.75]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E185ECB4Bxmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:59:26 -0000

Folks, the authors of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design) believe it is ready for working group last call. Please review this draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published. Your input is important!



This document is the 2nd series of documents related to DHCPv6 failover - the first is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-requirements which is currently being reviewed by the IESG for publication approval.



At the time of this writing, there is no IPR reported against this draft.



As Tomek is a co-author, I will primarily evaluate consensus after 2013-08-09 (August 9th). This is a 3 week last call because of the Berlin IETF meeting and also because of summer-time vacations (at least for those of us in the northern hemisphere).



Thanks,


-          Bernie