Re: [dhcwg] Anyone interested in continuing draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt?

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 22 August 2013 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D950411E8101 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BY-et3lFbIrJ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199D721F9EBE for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtMFANv/FVKQ/khR/2dsb2JhbABagwU1gyW9M4EdFnSCJAEBBAF5EAtGVwYuh28GDK5ukGYHgxt7A5AWiH2QLYFkgT06
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,934,1367971200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="86048688"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2013 12:14:40 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-97-67.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-97-67.cisco.com [10.61.97.67]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7MCEcav008702 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:14:38 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A41EEDF5-E2F7-4353-88C4-F81333929ED0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <5215FD5C.1050102@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:14:37 +0200
Message-Id: <A96C7639-9980-4636-8685-2DF9B0958676@employees.org>
References: <52123110.10205@gmail.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEDD8B410@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <5214BF85.8020509@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077525FA8A@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAC8QAcfaT2c3j1aFS0Qf2bieRs_MH1xov7CjE0POhMnU75YuiA@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077525FDB5@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <5215ee1f.a2c4440a.63af.10d6@mx.google.com> <5215FAF6.6060405@s-carlsen.dk> <5215FD5C.1050102@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Anyone interested in continuing draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:14:48 -0000

>> I may easily be wrong here but snooping sounds to me like a stop gap
>> solution i.e. what you do when no better method is available?
>> 
>> Seen from outside (my chair) it looks like there might be a need for a
>> protocol to talk directly with the switch/router, possibly first passing
>> a control/admin system that controls what may be set up in various
>> places in the network.
> 
> Sounds as if a combination of DHCP and another protocol be needed whenever DHCP PD is deployed in a DHCP Relay topology.
> 
> But something that describes the problem could indeed be written.

like:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stenberg-pd-route-maintenance-00

?

cheers,
Ole