Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Fri, 12 August 2016 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523AD12DA81 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qjMMm7ndcHLC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB7412D8D0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7CJJqcS056876; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 21:19:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201608121919.u7CJJqcS056876@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:10:10 -0000. <92dcf2e0cf08452caa5861f7258ea6c5@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 21:19:52 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/CPYNafLMb264NY-Zukg_McMLNSQ>
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Citing 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6' (rfc3315bis)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:22:21 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

>  Should RFC3315(bis) cite 'draft-ietf-dhc-secdhcpv6?

=> IMHO it should not and in particular it should not be referenced
as a replacement for authentication according to the new direction
taken by secdhcpv6 (i.e., encryption vs authentication).

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr