IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-host-gen-id-02

"Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com> Wed, 15 August 2012 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758C021F86F7 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 06:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zd9NPcfdo3Bg for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 06:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499C521F8613 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 06:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ghalwasi@cisco.com; l=6278; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1345037226; x=1346246826; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=N43JV8375GPT6r7iM+Cum1Xb7Ng3p5YVw5/Su2DoZFE=; b=VIOvV/eF/ry9SmHcNkIpjPOtK4Le9icwEi5FYp7CJK8eAd6yCsX7tknN QAfR4IRASaXgRaa6HMv3yJeZ8QJaxWXNNvQtUV38wMncYVezIux5wzhO6 hVjMGSEu10o641EwB78tTXdQUUl+dzttUCIohjpkck1q2oZGCqTBPPjTH Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABCjK1CtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABFgkq3TYEHgiABAQEEEgEaTBACAQgRBAEBCx0HMhQJCAIEAQ0FCBqHa5lJoEqLCIV3YAOje4Fmgl8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,773,1336348800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="111833971"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2012 13:27:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7FDR5s8014167 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:27:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.246]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:27:05 -0500
From: "Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-host-gen-id-02
Thread-Index: AQHNePgJ6EjzoGF6j0KwHUjTOoQDGZdXH58ggAAgh9CAAdqGoIAA+BcggACPzwCAAI85gP//roIg
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:27:03 +0000
Message-ID: <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB0D55C1@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com>
References: <2DCA645F-CDDF-4311-8417-3A9771AD3F71@nominum.com> <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB0D028F@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9239F0504A@szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.com> <90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB0D40AF@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B9239F060CC@szxeml545-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAL10_BrrHJSrP88q6S3o6YGWmR574djWEuOBowCq5pc8K0-a8Q@mail.gmail.com> <388CD216-17F9-463E-8CDB-F084C9D43C54@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <388CD216-17F9-463E-8CDB-F084C9D43C54@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.80.34]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19114.004
x-tm-as-result: No--38.752800-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_90903C21C73202418A48BFBE80AEE5EB0D55C1xmbalnx06ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-host-gen-id-02
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:27:07 -0000

Hi Ted,
I agree. It's 'state-less' usage of DHCPv6 Protocol.

Also, may I am missing anything. Why do we think client using "Information-Request" message is inappropriate in this case in comparison to using SOLICIT.?

Thanks,
Gaurav

From: Ted Lemon [mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 6:45 PM
To: Andre Kostur
Cc: Sheng Jiang; Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi); dhc WG
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-host-gen-id-02

On Aug 15, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Andre Kostur wrote:
I think that if the device wants a PA, it should supply an IA_PA in
its Solicit.  The device needs to specify an IAID.  An ORO is
insufficient.

The prefix is not necessarily specific to an individual client-it's not a prefix delegation.   So I don't think an IAID is necessary at all.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status