[dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Tue, 11 February 2014 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8592B1A073B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:39:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZCmH1uPOqoyy for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:39:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5271A072A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id cc10so5310978wib.10 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:39:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fP5M1SEF2pmMGmN07LeyODEwfU9EMhfPB0rkpM9mS7c=; b=rRzow3q9ajw2LeJaLPmDKBhM1ROAA0bJU9qUG29iZ8s/gz2dudDbNkzrQdrgec2KKy bsNWGwf3h3VpVuF153mnhwyVkoz8o79OltGDhzT3zI4qqZLBSOQvG0ukbKhia7/KODBY ylugmJI4LbhH+Jg1CbK+bGecdU1PhBmElPWY7uCCVJkfzCXT6TT7mrL4njz+MrJYKWIT qiVr843xqEFIWhevGG2r32HI4dE2zMyq6C11nEZZKHp8HrmkSzVh3ST0VkggUYaqqhFG iPmXmQG+ieEXzw0fb9tDKVGES9koDKTt+t7alR2thx4dxlBCw/XYJHtLcjFXvi3J9l/b gjKw==
X-Received: by 10.180.91.17 with SMTP id ca17mr70602wib.41.1392151164734; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h13sm46770215wjr.22.2014.02.11.12.39.23 for <dhcwg@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52FA8A77.9000504@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:39:19 +0100
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <52FA85BB.7090003@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52FA85BB.7090003@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20140211213919815
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <52FA85BB.7090003@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:39:27 -0000

We have adopted two active leasequery drafts after Vancouver meeting.
There was moderate interest in that work during adoption call, but
we never saw any discussions about them on the ML. Since authors
confidence in those proposals are high due to existing implementations,
they have requested WGLC.

After a quick discussion between chairs, we have decided to go ahead
with the WGLC, hoping that it will trigger some reviews and discussion.
Please make no mistake - those drafts need reviews and comments. A
simple "I support this" followed with couple +1s will not do do the
trick here.

This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00. Please send
your comments by Feb. 28th. Note that although both documents are very
similar, they are separate drafts and are going through separate WGLCs.
If you support this work, make sure that you clearly state which draft
(v4, v6 or both) you support. Each WGLC will be assessed independently.

Finally, I'd also remind you that we are looking for volunteers to do
the shepherding work. Please let us know if you'd like to be a shepherd
for one of those documents. It is not a difficult task, but some prior
IETF experience is necessary. As a shepherd, you can get unique insight
into the WGLC process and better exposure to how IESG works. Having such
an experience can be useful with moving your own draft forward faster.

Bernie & Tomek