[dhcwg] Leasequery draft update

Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Wed, 12 March 2003 21:04 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA22708; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:04:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2CLJ5O15262; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:19:05 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2CLIPO15230 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:18:25 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA22664 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:03:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from goblet.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@goblet.cisco.com [161.44.168.80]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2CL5tvD005002; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:05:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from KKINNEAR-W2K.cisco.com (dhcp-161-44-149-192.cisco.com [161.44.149.192]) by goblet.cisco.com (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id ACU23304; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:05:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030312160053.023726e0@goblet.cisco.com>
X-Sender: kkinnear@goblet.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:05:52 -0500
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Cc: kkinnear@cisco.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [dhcwg] Leasequery draft update
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Folks,

I have updated the leasequery draft to try to address the issues
raised by Thomas Narten concerning the problem statement and how
it relates to the actual protcol extension described in the
draft.

I have changed the Abstract and the beginning of sections 1, 3,
4, and 5.  The changes were restricted to the first few
paragraphs of each numbered section.

I mis-read the IETF deadline and so missed it.  The draft is
available, however, at:

http://www.dhcp.org/draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-05.txt

I also made two minor editorial corrections to the draft found
during the WG last call.

Kim

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg