Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-06

CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Sat, 06 June 2020 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD373A1053 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sA8WgDMSnZ1q for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7163A1050 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 03:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id 18so12038166iln.9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 03:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/TNWqvnfivqa8qK0njJEnCVD9DwxUWvWNwqcRL2UcZo=; b=NlxzLkYJP5kacgpFYic/JnJ375XMQ5u9zfeFy6HWr2axRGjCWE1DCYjQoe53P/4JYx Fkd3I8XNzoWyNOLhE7lvwigQLETDE4mODm6wi8aRiRmLc+vmmiMRobXCF6RkNFiaTQJE tjSma4n7OLpVWErIdCrYkH+ip8OrmuMmB+iVtVZfgQCTRsi/kioQAntX3jGhGgndHIW7 E8qDSTjTPgckhhf8t6U4G3ti0Kahi4ISPl1cTf/q3tD/SgVl/ftJ30c/WOO7vWlnQHic ttIBU7hU5VR8oMgtQiNVErBMyI5zxb/bsiUcKQ0HPebyo04ZJ8uukWMHVperSK8OYJJU tzxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/TNWqvnfivqa8qK0njJEnCVD9DwxUWvWNwqcRL2UcZo=; b=VB9f3BeWUyJccuMz+OxLx6Q970Q5qqC9uJs12ryBR/Sd5NQMTaEJutVNJqcNbfJdwW wQZVEGk0Xg5KlG92nnR2Q0ZwAV8ev+zBM8EUThfo20mFbwI6gazLUNFFK6OAKw/rlxQ5 B3p0EWSD4M+ZAHxUWlIyCoK0tQkKrNbm8kf484hOygMRUZhyl2O3dznw9QKB06vfHXDs CFo4fPKJwrMPaZIoTZ6ASStn6yDOBDw/0cKDjXL0xxjunhu0Txj+WkXDgxEPDqqIi+Yr iw1+KZZgCa+dqpyXpum+nWIIXE3gNI/X7VM2FLLvALtTITZNPQTkha4OTqvj5EnydPT0 8/dQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hpkNvL9qZYf7PEbPLOnJtpKUsJFTmC8EcQcbIgsekSSNnnRja nbs2kddDTDdGeWbBu83cEbiCmlfqxgJ/dFLHI/ZsZA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywEmGS3vy0/xseKOlpMgm/rB7PPukWiEqLAIStnwexfaQ+PUBM9UKMvXPmzgOmNnc4DRjEjCaTli6rYykr/xA=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce47:: with SMTP id a7mr12677874ilr.288.1591438279857; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 03:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159120898987.8437.4415340061530507051@ietfa.amsl.com> <BN7PR11MB2547980E661065157C679E8ACF880@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR11MB2547980E661065157C679E8ACF880@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 12:11:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CALypLp-xwY9hw7DiJ78pYsZ=OEBrqtuUhv7mH4J7PN9wA_q+bA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Cc: Tatuya Jinmei <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005a725005a76799af"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/EGGYWgUvDj9utvZZfoAFSYZxkuk>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-06
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 10:11:25 -0000

Hi Jinmei, Bernie,

Apologies for the belated e-mail. Thanks Jinmei for the review.

I agree with Bernie's responses, thanks for that.

Carlos

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 9:56 PM Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Jinmei.
>
> Thanks much for the review!
>
> Comments below (BV>). Carlos may also have some.
>
> As these are fairly minor, I will queue them up for a -08 as there may be
> more discussion on these comments and/or IESG reviews may raise some
> additional issues.
>
> - Bernie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-dir <int-dir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tatuya Jinmei via
> Datatracker
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 2:30 PM
> To: int-dir@ietf.org
> Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign.all@ietf.org;
> last-call@ietf.org
> Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-06
>
> Reviewer: Tatuya Jinmei
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
> Directors. Document editors and
> shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat
> comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any
> other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the
> INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ .
>
> I've reviewed draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-06 (07 was submitted while I was
> reviewing 06, and I also checked 07 on some specific points to see if it's
> changed, but the check is not comprehensive so some comments may be already
> moot or addressed.)  I think this draft is basically ready.  Its purpose
> and protocol details are well written, and the protocol is generally a
> straightforward application of the basic
> DHCPv6 (IP) address assignment protocol as described in RFC8415.  I didn't
> find any obvious problem.
>
> My comments are largely editorial.  The first one for Section 8 may need
> some discussion, but I'd basically leave the authors whether/how to address
> the comments including this one.
>
> Specific comments:
>
> - Section 1:
>
>    The IEEE originally set aside half of the 48-bit MAC Address space
>    for local use (where the U/L bit is set to 1).  In 2017, the IEEE
>    specified an optional specification (IEEE 802c) that divides this
>    space into quadrants (Standards Assigned Identifier, Extended Local
>    Identifier, Administratively Assigned Identifier, and a Reserved
>    quadrant) - more details are in Appendix A.
>
> I wonder whether this paragraph could refer to draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant