[dhcwg] L2RA Clarification
"MILES DAVID" <David.Miles@alcatel-lucent.com.au> Wed, 25 March 2009 21:32 UTC
Return-Path: <David.Miles@alcatel-lucent.com.au>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237FE28C17C for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.425, BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5icKeyBdPV9d for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E0A28C149 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (h135-1-218-53.lucent.com [135.1.218.53]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id n2PLXich027348; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:33:45 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.apac.alcatel-lucent.com (h202-65-2-130.alcatel.com [202.65.2.130]) by ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (8.13.8/emsr) with ESMTP id n2PLXhpm008249; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:33:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from sgsinsbhs01.ad4.ad.alcatel.com (sgsinsbhs01.ap.lucent.com [135.254.109.34]) by mail.apac.alcatel-lucent.com (8.13.7/8.13.7/Alcanet1.0) with ESMTP id n2PLWqON004603; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:32:52 +0800
Received: from SGSINSMBS02.ad4.ad.alcatel.com ([135.254.109.30]) by sgsinsbhs01.ad4.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:33:42 +0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9AD91.5E1250AE"
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:30:08 +0800
Message-ID: <986DCE2E44129444B6435ABE8C9E424D02F28AAD@SGSINSMBS02.ad4.ad.alcatel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: L2RA Clarification
Thread-Index: AcmtkN8Q7tQ91VCKRaG+HTVgQKu36A==
From: MILES DAVID <David.Miles@alcatel-lucent.com.au>
To: wdec@cisco.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2009 21:33:42.0076 (UTC) FILETIME=[5E4D57C0:01C9AD91]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 202.65.2.130
Subject: [dhcwg] L2RA Clarification
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:32:57 -0000
Woj, I just checked the draft-ietf-dhc-l2ra-03 and there is nothing in this draft I can see that is new/not per current implementation. The Relay Agent Information Option (RFC 3046) is commonly known as Option-82. It is not the option described in draft-ietf-l2ra-extensions-01: this extensions draft defines a Relay Agent Hardware Address which may be what you were thinking of. This would lead me to ask the WG whether this we can progress last call pending Woj's comments? Unfortunately the original agenda linked the l2ra-extenions draft by mistake. Cheers, David Miles
- [dhcwg] L2RA Clarification MILES DAVID
- Re: [dhcwg] L2RA Clarification Wojciech Dec (wdec)
- Re: [dhcwg] L2RA Clarification MILES DAVID