[dhcwg] review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 chapters 18
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Sun, 07 August 2016 14:07 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC5812D61D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 07:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T15lEfEqsAcP for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 07:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A716112D61B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 07:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u77E5N9O092711 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:05:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201608071405.u77E5N9O092711@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 16:05:23 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/EbsIc4m34k7r-W8CeNFlYKqAAMM>
Subject: [dhcwg] review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 chapters 18
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 14:07:34 -0000
Here is the review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 chapter 18 (was chapter 20 in RFC 3315) Relay Agent behavior pages 77-80: - 18.1 Relaying Client/Relay-Forward page 77: link- layer -> link-layer - 18.1.1 Relaying Client page 78: in the link-address field -> to (or into? BTW 18.1 uses the word "to" and 18.1.2 "into"). - same: wording "may fill in the link-layer" -> "may fill the link-layer" - 18.1.2 Relaying Relay Agent page 78: perhaps the two "global or site- scoped" must be changed into "global, ULA [RFC4193] or site-scoped"? Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
- [dhcwg] review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05 ch… Francis Dupont