IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Prague: SeDHCPv6

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 31 May 2017 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D661129AA3 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FRYadRHhADJt for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36773128ACA for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f55so19775356qta.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tenJoD9dSCZWO+le+gbX8F1lqWIJhZDfc6lMV9T9LSc=; b=ro7iTfXVIEY52umq9oZUWuya+jYngTMSQ66Rh9Rjwd+r3ntrYi/n4lqyHSJKYwM+d5 AXIlEfUiK02K60DcztTqIieGnMlxFhocUMjHksC6aND4yt05oOjZUvEh+zOBP5Elf/+u bgOBC9oZs3sfGrxRrd+LGSgQdVh1ALRpsENlKqqzmlcpfOSH2Isgk79yOklsp2zUPEJH gWlb6OPZEJ6TDAybGEcj/Hw0UyOR6rg44LjuAexf5siMtg2UBBp1lZ9tqZixF57Rbqx1 L7vggSaSJqFihXlheuGBNH3VFhTa1Pv7juoetqV5sq8pM8hheHUcaiwYEb2yeZzvPp5l NiHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tenJoD9dSCZWO+le+gbX8F1lqWIJhZDfc6lMV9T9LSc=; b=BihR6pCM7IRB4c9ikyvgrlOsu45Ftu4X1tHNrfUwtGBVxgvLVqfvbwldKbbVsFRiPa FqgZ0pW0JeLzOvIGkDHdJ1I3NOUYMHRpb0S0ImCHbk1EkSFmxfBKuJ7wQiidvF1YR/jC vjB4SDruVseB/jv52sSHXB8E2d74vQbF6779f1zgPzdojRQ9CTjC1336uwmCi9xXqYuK 8cclJXDHUAaaJwJPedx+6XH/r0hnWfTm5lVgCdvXt0H5vwEUvW/0Nd7q1T7w/fj6hnTl xYpsS5x3Nw1sjxPopVt6HK59X+KRzLwkR86E7r7hlEQUZyMd/SF7G5/IEo1MOlU2DvAL 4mkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcB3UJIQPFq36txVXiju3IOJ8TE8DmakzgsfocGN14GxWopgcMqG 2sYyjjVXoL/Tv9wzOezuNg==
X-Received: by 10.237.53.149 with SMTP id c21mr34570958qte.191.1496257378363; Wed, 31 May 2017 12:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm10920633qkf.14.2017.05.31.12.02.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 May 2017 12:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqfT2nDLPsfGWC2-mKdL0QPB9Gc+bik3Gp1VCQWCcmrVRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:02:55 -0400
Cc: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <07525FFD-54C7-486E-B71C-9A282FD45967@fugue.com>
References: <C526A41E-9283-4D0F-88CA-EE8F61582D9D@cisco.com> <166ebb54-9a71-5bf9-669b-ff7be6f65ec7@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfT2nDLPsfGWC2-mKdL0QPB9Gc+bik3Gp1VCQWCcmrVRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/F4cT54YiBYpbwYFbrpTD7VA5_-4>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Prague: SeDHCPv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 19:03:01 -0000

This is only an issue if the transport can't handle packets larger than 512 bytes.

> On May 31, 2017, at 2:01 PM, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> At Wed, 31 May 2017 17:36:05 +0200,
> Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> As previously mentioned, we'll have a DHCP hackathon in Prague. As
>> usual, the hackathon will take place on the weekend immediately before
>> IETF (July 15-16). This time we will be focusing on SeDHCPv6. If you
>> somehow missed all the discussions so far, the
>> draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-21 defines Secure DHCPv6, an encrypted and
>> possibly authenticated version of DHCPv6 protocol. The goal of this
>> hackathon is to extend existing DHCPv6 implementations and attempt
>> inter-operability testing for encryption and authentication. We hope to
>> have the following implementations at various stages of maturity:
> 
> I guess there's at least one fundamental open issue to be resolved
> before even trying to implement it:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/current/msg18116.html
> 
> I'm afraid this is so fundamental that it's almost useless to have a
> hackathon without a consensus on it.  (For some other issues yet to be
> uncovered hackathon would actually be a good opportunity to find them.
> But I suspect this one is too fundamental to be that type of issue).
> 
> --
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email