[dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-02.txt
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Thu, 06 February 2003 18:01 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA28422 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:01:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h16I8Si20263 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:08:28 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h16I8Sp20260 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:08:28 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA28397 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:01:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h16I6Xp19491; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:06:34 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h16945p13534 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 04:04:05 -0500
Received: from netcore.fi (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA09034 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 03:57:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1690df18991; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:00:39 +0200
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 11:00:38 +0200
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030205160932.051c5948@funnel.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302061049360.18345-100000@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-02.txt
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Ralph Droms wrote: > DHCPv6" <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6 opt-dnsconfig-02.txt>. The last call will > conclude on Friday, 2/21. > > Note that this is a parallel WG last call in the dhc, ipv6 and dnsext WGs. > > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6 opt-dnsconfig-02.txt describes two options for > DHCPv6: the Domain Name Server option and the Domain Search List option. > This document is being considered for Proposed Standard as an extension > to the base DHCPv6 specification, and is available as > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-02.txt A few comments; I haven't looked too deep into DHCPv6 to be able to comment on those parts, but there are some definite need for revisal in the doc..: 2. Requirements The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, [...] ==> I'd put these under Introduction or Terminology sections, no use having a separate section with a questionable title. option-length: Length of the 'options' field in octets; must be a multiple of 16 ==> 'options' field has not been defined. Is it the whole option or just the length of DNS-server address options (I assume so)? If the former, there must be 32 bits of zero padding. Is it ok that the options aren't 64-bit aligned? The list of domain names in the 'searchstring' MUST be encoded as specified in section "Representation and use of domain names" of the DHCPv6 specification [4]. ==> I didn't bother to check, but I guess this document also defines how to pad the names to get some desired level of alignment? 6. Appearance of these options The Domain Name Server option MUST appear only in the following messages: Solicit, Advertise, Request, Confirm, Renew, Rebind, Information-Request, Reply. The Domain Search List option MUST appear only in the following messages: Solicit, Advertise, Request, Confirm, Renew, Rebind, Information-Request, Reply. ==> I would reword these differently, like: The Domain Name Server option MUST NOT appear in other than the following messages: .... ==> is it ok to server to give only one of these options but not the other? References ==> split the references [4] Bound, J., Carney, M., Perkins, C., Lemon, T., Volz, B. and R. Droms (ed.), "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-23 (work in progress), February 2002. ==> update this draft version Author's Address Ralph Droms (ed.) ==> the author is an editor, but the draft does not have acknowledgements or contributors section. Just remove Editor if nobody else contributed to the document. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt… Ralph Droms
- [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… Pekka Savola
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Ralph Droms
- [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… Peter Koch
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Robert Elz
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- [dhcwg] WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt… Ralph Droms
- [dhcwg] WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt… Ralph Droms
- [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… Alain Durand
- [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Alain Durand
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Alain Durand
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Pekka Savola
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Pekka Savola
- [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Robert Elz
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Alain Durand
- [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… Rob Austein
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Mika Liljeberg
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Pekka Savola
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Mika Liljeberg
- [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… Mika Liljeberg
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Bill Manning
- IPv4-mapped API [Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on … Mika Liljeberg
- [dhcwg] RE: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6… juha.wiljakka
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dh… David Terrell