Re: [dhcwg] Static IP's vs. DHCP for NT/Win2K servers
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 18 April 2002 22:57 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA25033 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id SAA10397 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:57:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10341; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:56:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10183 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:52:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA24940 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:52:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from green.bisbee.fugue.com (user-2ive7ai.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.29.82]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.11.3/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g3IMpwr07207; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dechen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.bisbee.fugue.com (8.10.2/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g3IMqQ203986; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:52:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:52:26 -0400
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Static IP's vs. DHCP for NT/Win2K servers
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481)
Cc: "'dhcwg@ietf.org'" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: "Handy, Norman W." <Norman.Handy@nscorp.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <C9E5E5124D7F984E8BA307B0A84684F201D6AFDB@exch04s-172>
Message-Id: <F4116D59-531E-11D6-A092-00039317663C@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In general, I wouldn't recommend doing this. You are adding a common point of failure to your system - if DHCP goes down for longer than half the lease interval, the servers will start to fail. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Static IP's vs. DHCP for NT/Win2K servers Handy, Norman W.
- Re: [dhcwg] Static IP's vs. DHCP for NT/Win2K ser… Ted Lemon