Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-02 - respond by Apr 26

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 07 April 2017 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AEA126B71 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BMcvlTqYlGeI for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C36EA129631 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id g2so48828345pge.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Tuql3L4g+k7ODaxU8yxJ8D+kVR81TuqTm9Of4SIHd5o=; b=mf+GRjOWyMHb4Jr6Rlumr+mA5cPYMqjgt522DBTgSehqUHOhaxErlQJOYxIKbv99w6 M2dEoM9lwp0f5y+sUyp5f47bBQgp6KDg3P1Y1na6z0y8b9AtIHB0M/DlPYIVTV9EcZ49 kaefizGKqrKQiGFNxJQ8KecZeWxPV3Tvlexu7tLejM/5ez3pV+xijOBNUnRJZvKxbbwu AYBGveJPvn/p1ztlx4h6aS0CjFoUm7Y2+j5xD7BkZAxVdtrLiJOTRZqidQIrlZ76Dewi 5zCGJsWa4XbzdbXihLyglL5S8NXEs3n+7pnfwBF8RsPF8bRRuwqqr5OsJvyM2sYwefgb 2SAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Tuql3L4g+k7ODaxU8yxJ8D+kVR81TuqTm9Of4SIHd5o=; b=hy5xKvIrV7Z2uJx+2UstgDxaENk6niCUbZy5cq/FD6v6+Ee9DiDV/5dznTpUlqdUXl L2TtWNB2iOCe6fnLas6cqx3+OvxtagG0c+PuyxJYW1ohoWJcHE79v/lo1i4JaFARiX6Z TfGgKU5zqjH0Moy3lgHxtOaWf3OdvRcIYJe/gmvCUHXIwMEIt/884Tt8zCKSdgx7m1p4 HCHZuxfoUWCk7C2d/6KoGFED/tkRARHlBXxYpiw8DtdJAIexvhlaTAUmRW/k1Qxs2x+b iZHnoVmA7xGBuF0F1PiYLw1fal9NqGRxicP/KHxGdYfTr5YyiyqwW0JceIZP5ifd21QW ZZjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3ULRbiMl1GIHt/1uH5pT+FbuNhwGAJxhx5tavbWR1s6eFRLOZc6Pqxmx86ZW0HMQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.24.9 with SMTP id 9mr16932530pfy.73.1491523497421; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::b60:17:bd93:844f:7473:6719? ([2620:0:b60:17:bd93:844f:7473:6719]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d1sm5683122pfa.5.2017.04.06.17.04.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC8EABF0-A7EB-42EF-A78A-9B1DAC2A12C1@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:03:36 -0700
Cc: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <51E35331-9AFA-4C75-851D-129AF3E3F5A8@fugue.com>
References: <4cb9bdab-f3a2-a9d0-1056-302b5ecdeae7@gmail.com> <6815847B-EEB6-4824-959E-F8D845A14994@fugue.com> <BC8EABF0-A7EB-42EF-A78A-9B1DAC2A12C1@cisco.com>
To: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/FceYFHLaF7qKbc_bsWtbLZu4Ixc>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-02 - respond by Apr 26
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:05:00 -0000

No, that's not quite what I mean.   What I mean is that you have to explicitly say what the DHCP server does.   Right now I'm not seeing that.    Maybe I missed it—I read the document pretty quickly.

> On Apr 6, 2017, at 5:02 PM, Naiming Shen (naiming) <naiming@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Ted,
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion. Currently in section 6 “Compatibility”, it says:
> 
>     It is recommended to upgrade the server side first before using a non-DHCP
>     UDP port for a relay agent.
> 
> How about changing to this:
> 
>    The DHCP server MUST be upgraded to support the extension specified
>    in this document before the extension is used by a relay agent.