Re: [dhcwg] What sorts of services does DHCP configure?

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Thu, 17 October 2013 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C638B11E81B5 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 05:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4n3NglUgF0Xo for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 05:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A811C11E81D2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 05:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=890; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382013335; x=1383222935; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=kYngHKp1E4OGsSim9kUxl+0kt9S1MazZ1xNDDbzKVdg=; b=DMw2KYt8fjcUEYD2xm5t65C8VLZGXeqFaB3DcfqpdtbqLubjGS281a9/ S2CwBs618bvecrO3pas5UA4NDr7bUUxdI3XUp7RyNTcGRe0nYja65Jpk2 UdRLZ8aM7oauxDRtog9cTz0oSWvQvL/7vTg+UvWnrOJcxLHDwfUvD03yl 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAE3ZX1KtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABagwc4Ur4CgSMWdIInAQQBAQE3NAsSAQgiFDcLJQIEAQ0FCBOHawzAHwSPIDEHgx+BBwOqCoMkgik
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,514,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="273048893"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2013 12:35:30 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9HCZUqi028992 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:35:30 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.27]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([fe80::200:5efe:173.37.183.34%12]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:35:30 -0500
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] What sorts of services does DHCP configure?
Thread-Index: AQHOynEUiAXKk6KM3ESJzga2BnKmuZn3s2OAgACxKQCAAC5LgIAABYaAgAABXICAABx3AP///iCA
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:35:30 +0000
Message-ID: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F06040B7372C4@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AD49A8B@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.21.68.203]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B85952114DEB894C85B0AD5917C4B05D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] What sorts of services does DHCP configure?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:35:48 -0000

On 10/16/13 10:42 PM, "Sheng Jiang" <jiangsheng@huawei.com> wrote:

>>It's pretty clear to me that this option is not a very good idea in most
>>cases.
>>I don't think the DHC working group is in a position to say no to it,
>>but we are
>>certainly in a position to say "this isn't a good general solution to X"
>
>Why DHC WG cannot say no to what should not be in DHC? If that's the
>case, we have no points to discuss here what should or should not be
>configured using DHC protocol. People will keep to "borrow" DHCP for
>their unsuitable purposes as long as they do not have another suitable
>protocol.

Agree. I'm a little puzzled by the first referenced paragraph as well. Why
all this exercise?
 


>
>Regards,
>
>Sheng
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg