RE: [dhcwg] server behaviour for Decline
"Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se> Wed, 12 September 2001 19:42 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA01388; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:42:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA07271; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:41:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA07248 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:41:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [208.237.135.240]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA01366 for <Dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:41:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mr6.exu.ericsson.se (mr6u3.ericy.com [208.237.135.123]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8CJfM714695 for <Dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:41:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from eamrcnt749 (eamrcnt749.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.133.47]) by mr6.exu.ericsson.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f8CJfMs02345 for <Dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:41:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: FROM eamrcnt760.exu.ericsson.se BY eamrcnt749 ; Wed Sep 12 14:41:21 2001 -0500
Received: by eamrcnt760.exu.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <P4MQT85T>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:41:20 -0500
Message-ID: <66F66129A77AD411B76200508B65AC697B359C@eambunt705.ena-east.ericsson.se>
From: "Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se>
To: 'Artur Guja' <skybird@3miasto.net>, Dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] server behaviour for Decline
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:41:18 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C13BC2.E47F3280"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
An updated draft is in the works. The Decline basically could be used for one reasons ... if one or more addresses is "in use" by another node on the link (discovered via Duplicate Address Detection). The server should remove that address (or addresses) from the client's IA and "mark" the address as in possible conflict. - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: Artur Guja [mailto:skybird@3miasto.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:07 PM To: Dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: [dhcwg] server behaviour for Decline Hi, What is the server behaviour upon recieving the Decline message? This message seems to be generaly poorly defined. Or have I missed something? Artur Guja _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] server behaviour for Decline Artur Guja
- RE: [dhcwg] server behaviour for Decline Bernie Volz (EUD)