Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 09 December 2013 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA6D1AE5B9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:59:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4sY0qeonNi3a for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og127.obsmtp.com (exprod7og127.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40641AE57C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob127.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUqY9V0bxrMvaE4SUCZrksqonOOmZN1E+@postini.com; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:59:52 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B331B82B6 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56C7190043; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vpna-132.vpn.nominum.com (192.168.1.10) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:59:51 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADD09A3@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:59:47 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <41E0E078-319B-47BF-B8EE-8B93E1521E26@nominum.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADD09A3@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:59:57 -0000

On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> So, we are seeking input as to whether the WG should now also work on the DHCPv4 version of active leasequery, given that the DHCPv6 version was adopted.

Not at all wearing my AD hat, I think it's worth doing.