Re: [dhcwg] dhcpv6 'zone suffix' option

On Nov 10, 2004, at 10:13 AM, Bernie Volz wrote:
> By putting it in the IA_* options, we're restricting it to stateful 
> (PD or
> NA) but I don't think that's an issue (especially if we don't use it to
> communicate the zone name).

I would encourage you not to put any language in the draft that 
explicitly refers to stateful versus not stateful.   I think it's 
likely that we will want to support dynamic DNS updates with the 
Information Request message using the FQDN option.   In this case, the 
client would have to send an IA option, in order to identify it for the 
purposes of doing the DNS update.   So if you don't explicitly say 
anything about stateful vs. non-stateful, we don't need to update your 
draft when we write a draft explaining how to do updates with stateless 
DHCPv6.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg