[dhcwg] Interface
"Guja, ArturX" <ArturX.Guja@intel.com> Tue, 18 September 2001 19:41 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA00602; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:41:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA29566; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA29546 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:34:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 3miasto.net (root@3miasto.net [217.96.12.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA00391 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:34:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from SCOPE (pc64.gdynia.sdi.tpnet.pl [213.77.131.64]) by 3miasto.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f8IJXMh17587 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 21:33:22 +0200
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 21:32:54 +0200
From: "Guja, ArturX" <ArturX.Guja@intel.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091
Reply-To: "Guja, ArturX" <ArturX.Guja@intel.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <173693552.20010918213254@3miasto.net>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Sender: Artur Guja <skybird@3miasto.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dhcwg] Interface
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sorry for posting so many questions, but I'm working overtime on my diploma here. I'm really grateful for any input. So another one: Is the client required to send DHCPv6 messages through the interface it is going to configure, or can it send them through any interface? I mean, why should there be such a restriction? After all, it sends the DUID and the link-local address in the message. It might as well use ANY interface for communication with the server, eg. when it is multi-homed, and there is a DHCP server available on only one link, but it serves the whole net :))) I know it was mentioned somewhere, but I can't find it. :))) Soory to bother you :))) Artur _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Interface Guja, ArturX
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comments in… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Thomas Narten
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Thomas Narten
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ralph Droms