[dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01 - Respond by March 31, 2014

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 13 March 2014 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8121A06D2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HIRUf6PRwaiv for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF971A06A4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4354; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1394678180; x=1395887780; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=2a1JBQYKNjPszT0L/SRqx4K23xcsvCBo261dC1Q5Z0E=; b=MPQxlm5g1/NJzO/qg1crIxh2ttm83plHbHWQRLLwsZkWFFddbWUZc+jC u7f8ndSr+dfpKe/Xv/F7kbhMBYXGr8xpoX0T7xie9/82M3f/EmHCI32sX kt3CTvCth74uOUf4WS9lq5lsd0A5qBgyiAYgkyOs+9kuTjTps4i2jbjWb Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FANUYIVOtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABZgkJEO1fBX4EfFnSCJwEELV4BKlYmAQQbh3GiR7EHF44rg1yBFASqcoMtgis
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,643,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="306919282"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2014 02:36:20 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2D2aJ5Z000502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 02:36:19 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.92]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:36:19 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01 - Respond by March 31, 2014
Thread-Index: Ac8+ZAWxLB0+cGh7TmezKNoQaI9Gng==
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 02:36:19 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF08ACE@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.242.107]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF08ACExmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/HfHS8DL6PXn4XGdh0lJeKuku854
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01 - Respond by March 31, 2014
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 02:36:28 -0000

This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01. Please send your comments by March 31, 2014. If you do not feel this document should advance, please state your reasons why.



Please take some time out to read this document and provide us your feedback (it is a very short draft).



Some history:



We had done a WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-00 back in early 2013 and while we considered it to have sufficient consensus, there were comments that required a new revision and given the long gap between the last call and the revised document, we are doing another last call.



Tomek is the document shepherd.



Regards,



Bernie & Tomek