Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Question
Simon Hobson <dhcp1@thehobsons.co.uk> Wed, 28 September 2016 07:09 UTC
Return-Path: <dhcp1@thehobsons.co.uk>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E361112B391 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQKG4o6pXEGb for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:baa::21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B901212B26A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at patsy.thehobsons.co.uk
Received: from simons-macbookpro.lan (magpiehouse.plus.com [80.229.10.150]) by patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C29461BC77 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:09:49 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Simon Hobson <dhcp1@thehobsons.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <D3E4C547-B66D-436D-BF0E-2588777D7629@thehobsons.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:09:49 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <756CE9AA-57F8-4797-92C1-E3946B8E31E7@thehobsons.co.uk>
References: <DB4PR04MB055767E3B1418456D580625DAFCC0@DB4PR04MB0557.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <D3E4C547-B66D-436D-BF0E-2588777D7629@thehobsons.co.uk>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Hq0LuatJPIk7C5NNijLlpEDJ6Rk>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Question
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:10:00 -0000
I wrote: > Of particular note - and relevant to this list since this is the support list for it - the ISC (the same people that bring us BIND) wrote a server, relay agent, and client package which was designed to be as pure and clean an implementation of the protocol as written as is possible. Just testing ;-) I see no-one picked up on the fact that I was responding to the DHC WG list and not the ISC DHCP list :-/
- [dhcwg] DHCP Question Patrick Malik Tousgaard
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Question Simon Hobson
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Question Simon Hobson
- Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Question Ted Lemon