Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-03 - Respond by Dec 2, 2013

Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com> Thu, 28 November 2013 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <msiodelski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FB51AE061 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 03:55:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kc_jXEw2XLC1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 03:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A101AE016 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 03:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c11so6054527lbj.19 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 03:55:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SxcuzwQqv0BQRLNvRBGmFDFtaur8Jtb/8A4+AuNIN8k=; b=XJBGAyU9vogB9RIyWjc6uSFsm4ow4LI+/Lu4EihroKQ8FpG6NtS+DSNWnN/spCBgpO i1/4fX8nTOdfMgqQrAwKFxBa46CydhMvLU/anpL6DazW4HlzVFjWsYwqL/Phv7KZwiOr jsIWlsqt+JPiPrVs4Drxy8iHwKw7RX9r3voP9B7ohOZ/3pFZclRt/aF0YDaOsDGM6T2j Vrcc+KSscLSQC+4LAiqti0wOv2pP+LEq0rGQyoCGg8JBTr0KU9OFVRBG5PMqZmqgOvUi g6thv4g8yoD6M+rs3Ee8eC/zzO0oaKs99kCoam4qqHxpDYpcA0noTV/Vx+cgy+bCGy44 mPAQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.138.196 with SMTP id qs4mr21051lbb.75.1385639711744; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 03:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.62.166 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 03:55:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADC2A5B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD98DE0@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADC2A5B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:55:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFGoqUMh-xT+GsJQNHGUcisqcphAVFZXnQ6ac+GXq76wBBiyYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-03 - Respond by Dec 2, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:55:14 -0000

I have read the document and I support it move forward.

Can you please clarify those two issues below? Perhaps I misunderstood
something...

ISSUE 1

In the "3.  Problem Statement:"

"But RFC3315 doesn't explicitly describe how the relay
   agent can find out it should send a message towards the server or
   towards the client."

I am a little confused. The RFC3315 pretty much solves the problem in
section 20. The proof is that you actually refer to appropriate
sections of RFC3315 in sections 4.2 and 4.3 of your draft. Did I miss
something?


ISSUE 2
In this sentence:

"In the case that a new type of relay message is sent to a relay agent
   but the relay agent doesn't recognize it, the message is put into a
   Relay-forward message and sent to the server."

Why "new type of relay message", not "new type of message"? I don't
quite understand what the relay message is in this context.

Thanks.
Marcin


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> This is friendly reminder that we need responses by end of day (anywhere in
> the world) December 2nd. Sorry for the ‘late’ reminder for those in the US
> enjoying Thanksgiving.
>
>
>
> So far, there has only been Sheng’s (document shepherd) comments.
>
>
>
> <WG Co-Chair Hat OFF>
>
> I add my support for this document (with Sheng’s comments addressed as he
> captured my nits and more).
>
>
>
> -          Bernie
>
>