Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt
"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Fri, 17 February 2017 22:35 UTC
Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4D51296CC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:35:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MmaXBuhdws6I for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.184.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034D71294A5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:34:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id v1HMYxU1039486; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:34:59 -0700
Received: from XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [137.136.239.220]) by phx-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id v1HMYovP039042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:34:50 -0700
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com (2002:8988:eede::8988:eede) by XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (2002:8988:efdc::8988:efdc) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:34:49 -0800
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com ([137.136.238.222]) by XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com ([137.136.238.222]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:34:49 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSglOjbTsgor1qYk63PeyrUa0poqFqmOCwgAHRRkCAAWtvcA==
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 22:34:49 +0000
Message-ID: <21bd317edc764fc89dc4a13aa541b1c1@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <148455739520.22478.14651605359463322132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAJ3w4NdCk8CBfNagcXT_VW_50+=xK=N7aB5HHqqn3stMt7Gy-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqf_AP9w1Bh_5kSB4YkLaV9XJ1tngufAiOMxVqQLwMruNA@mail.gmail.com> <aba52c11e462426bb3cbf66fcdca7783@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqcG004FuUkKa0Xk1AiOo-bO4aHweYDpxMeeg+_=dSK6FQ@mail.gmail.com> <5c9ed55cfdc94456baf19740ba62910c@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqeshAHmvGukto+PKs_skVPF5bnukvw8+5_04YEx_6m_sQ@mail.gmail.com> <ABDD8B01-EC93-4ADD-AF59-57332A9C255E@fugue.com> <9d9d50b20005459aafffcd8f64bfb281@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9d9d50b20005459aafffcd8f64bfb281@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [137.136.248.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_21bd317edc764fc89dc4a13aa541b1c1XCH150608nwnosboeingcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/IPEysUpRnnPKfSpgE5V2mLEpSr4>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 22:35:02 -0000
Bernie, The discussion gravitated towards not resurrecting until the sedhcpv6 I-D progresses further. We will reevaluate this once sedhcpv6 is done. This does not make sense to me; sedhcpv6 is the very reason that RAAN is important. Just like RFC3971 did with IPv6 ND Timestamp and Nonce options, sedhcpv6 could define the RAAN operation and have everything over and done with in one pass. And, I have already identified a use case where RAAN is absolutely necessary. Also, I was unable to attend IETF97, where I certainly would have stood up and voiced my position. Thanks - Fred From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz) Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:39 PM To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>; 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt I presented about resurrecting draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate at IETF-97 (see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-dhc-resurrect-draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-00.pdf). And the conclusion then was (see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/minutes/minutes-97-dhc-00.txt): The discussion gravitated towards not resurrecting until the sedhcpv6 I-D progresses further. We will reevaluate this once sedhcpv6 is done. - Bernie From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 1:49 PM To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp<mailto:jinmei@wide.ad.jp>> Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt On Feb 15, 2017, at 1:32 PM, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp<mailto:jinmei@wide.ad.jp>> wrote: I personally don't think it a blocking issue for sedhcpv6, but, of course, the wg should decide it. It definitely isn't a blocking issue, but Fred is right that if we are going ahead with encryption-only, which I agree is the right move, we need to do this work as well.
- [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-i… Lishan Li
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lishan Li
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lishan Li
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Lishan Li
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for dra… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Ralph Droms