[dhcwg] Updates on draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant

CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 01 October 2020 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42103A0B0B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WIVZ2gUUzIzA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B7783A0B08 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id j11so6448535ejk.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M3fRMrY1PWOp1mpg/a1ag+jFWhXt23+/FqCe/3aaJVw=; b=KTeW1G0gLJzS25q8Jcs9I8cwBdoRNNl2hVtpbQV++jfLFV3xe+yIMzAHkqMr47gga5 g+MIF2kuWDT7uqVyL/Z2l/at9dd+GfFWHzgvFCKerzFW592CV1BNaAhbJwRhEDGR/qN4 nlNNm1QQMlfdupaefXhk8gs7qt5sF5fm9Nje9UoGLTyLGMqU1sveJpWB1AWudjOLqfTF ILuoEWU54xOpLFzyjhWkilxXvgsBbuBOGYmCfAG8ubVl4vUS8eM0zqLJsh9bOPQILVmS Uo1SGufO6zizHlZVrwjOdeZ+DIh9tYSaOdFU/oQZ0oCmZJBkqSfTy9l98QoodcdnMMpf 7iPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M3fRMrY1PWOp1mpg/a1ag+jFWhXt23+/FqCe/3aaJVw=; b=ini0+fZYJgyb4xPheWwFUrmzLGzZgxIhgI3eO09jAM17huiZs1dHMyfAuLSIteUi4A H2RenQ85UC4dzFwvcQvya5v0E9johCd1eQ9ksUlSMIUEarwRvjBPzGuEZZeiM3b3Ps1c v3hmvtIPl4MaIxYAKeUKup/YFrZJXkqlCek7V3SUOBoCIUR3Hndr01Lqx0fGjvYjGSYc lsPgsqDTGgMyB693Dwg1O8WKb593xfuGXDd5Lijp0AFwvzKsJ0npDMfJMOv+Yy1eNLRs t57A4w9EiEuSqxCZiqbTCgtmv9qftPHkV2G/qQ7ryNDDgkRjk0z284BAYsHM+cczkR3q 8/PQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gJcR/LJdLvZL23aT5i7DsrQPRJFTS8HHGwwJgnuh7zmWfis55 bzpxGIJCWYY4IoA1FF/4kAqiYACw/gFdVUy0cxM/QA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEO1KtVpKeGZE4NQneKLdeiELz0trrAt225lpQzTameP6m9rgM22NlsjNh/66FnIcXlU+StWtxnYaHYYFuauk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:33ca:: with SMTP id zk10mr4450727ejb.317.1601535056649; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 08:50:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CALypLp8TdmF2kuQdRpGnVOzAT78E4ZOXp4_yB5zUCGePKeHU2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roger Marks <roger@ethair.net>
Cc: ROBERT GROW <bobgrow@cox.net>, Glenn Parsons <glenn.parsons@ericsson.com>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, ANTONIO DE LA OLIVA DELGADO <aoliva@it.uc3m.es>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, "Stanley, Dorothy" <dorothy.stanley@hpe.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000025bbfe05b09670be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/IUwajOnFwOGQBrQD022JmOKRx9w>
Subject: [dhcwg] Updates on draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 06:51:01 -0000

Hi Roger, all,

Thanks again for the comments on the draft. I did try to incorporate most
of your comments. For the sake of completeness, I'm just summarizing below
the changes I made on the draft:

- I applied basically all the suggested edits (on abstract, introduction
and terminology sections).
- I made some minor changes to improve the motivation of the problem
statement, but note that this was extensively reviewed by the DHC WG. I've
modified the text regarding the IoT scenario to better explain the
motivation (section 1.1.1). I've also reformulated the text in section
1.1.2 to better explain the rationale behind the recommendations for SLAP
quadrant preferences in datacenter scenarios.
- As suggested, I removed the section on Quadrant Selection Mechanisms
examples (and put it in an annex).
- I did check all your comments regarding the DHCPv6 extensions section
(old section 4, now section 3). This part has been extensively reviewed and
approved by the DHC WG and the IETF and represent therefore the IETF
consensus. Since it refers to points related to the way the DHCPv6 protocol
works, we, the editors of the DHC WG document, do not intend to apply some
of your comments.
- I added all the suggested references and made the suggested corrections.

Note that most of the comments were addressed in
draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant-10 (posted early August), but I've just posted
draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant-11 [1] with some additional changes and small
corrections.

Thanks much for providing the comments and feedback on the draft.

Kind regards,

Carlos

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-slap-quadrant-11