[dhcwg] Anyone interested in continuing draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt?

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Mon, 19 August 2013 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B74621F92B7 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qyF1T5sq86s2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-x22a.google.com (mail-ee0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FCD11E8113 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b45so1025471eek.29 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yAQNlOa6NKg0pel5dCmEEdR8NYNUCpgPLcwh7i7q54o=; b=07K5egKbhWjrmcbWqFoe9V0ZEcG+spVyJ7fLAJs0XN+Oe+uJhP3w2nwTQ6PoAa5YpJ 9uZMcIJ5ktETct+OfzbZmAYIg+G7dq2IIlcAvqMmT9k45ZmMun8w/V6oHAHOfumdrwFD ybDhxRrlHJHO7TCDFZ9Q41w5jV7gCdwAaMhXLsous5Sv57AlnHLWOdroQ5Z/iBbOrWDz +r/8ESlxfx+s3dVvWkyQLMUUt+rk5rZdVZiIyF43MsMKD77Ysee1Znt24RjXtnDtYYrU +aNgl2fNknNup4D6CYXUc/7eWqaTXWQvD6OlxX0Z62PzU9QXXR2NMVb8GElLQ6PFl2xl 2uhg==
X-Received: by 10.14.88.65 with SMTP id z41mr23103287eee.38.1376923931206; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r48sm17949289eev.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52123110.10205@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:52:00 +0200
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dhcwg] Anyone interested in continuing draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:52:20 -0000

During Berlin meeting chairs asked if there is still interest in the
prefix-pool-option. There was nobody interested in the work in the room.
The unanimous consensus in the room was to drop it. I just wanted to
confirm that on the list.

If you are interested in this work, want to support it and participate
in it, please let us know by replying to the mailing list. Otherwise
we'll drop this work and mark that draft as a dead WG document.

Please respond within 2 weeks (until Sep. 2nd).

Bernie & Tomek