RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6

"Vijayabhaskar A K" <vijayak@india.hp.com> Wed, 16 January 2002 11:29 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA04097 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:29:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id GAA26617 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:29:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA26499; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:20:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA26479 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:20:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palrel11.hp.com (palrel11.hp.com [156.153.255.246]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA04039 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 06:20:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hpuxsrv.india.hp.com (hpuxsrv.india.hp.com [15.10.45.132]) by palrel11.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1FE001F5; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 03:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nt4147 (nt4147.india.hp.com [15.10.41.47]) by hpuxsrv.india.hp.com with SMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02) id QAA06361; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:45:57 +0530 (IST)
Reply-To: vijayak@india.hp.com
From: Vijayabhaskar A K <vijayak@india.hp.com>
To: 'Martin Stiemerling' <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:51:02 +0530
Message-ID: <001c01c19e7f$e22930b0$2f290a0f@india.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-reply-to: <15200000.1011177653@elgar>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Stiemerling [mailto:Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:11 PM
> To: vijayak@india.hp.com; dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
>
>
>
>
> --On Mittwoch, Januar 16, 2002 14:23:30 +0530 Vijayabhaskar A K
> <vijayak@india.hp.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > RFC for autoconf says that, in the absence of router,
>
> That's right.
>
> > the host must use DHCP. In this case, the static
> > route option will be very much helpful, for configuring
> > the routes.
>
> In the case of no on-link router, no routes are required!

In the absence of an on-link IPv6 router, hosts might use configured tunnels
to reach other IPv6 networks. Such routes can be sent in static-route
option.


>
> >
> > Regards
> > Vijay
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Martin Stiemerling [mailto:Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:05 PM
> >> To: vijayak@india.hp.com; dhcwg@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Vijay,
> >>
> >> why do you think a static route option is needed at all?
> >> For the sake of autoconfiguration it is better to keep the routing
> >> information in the routers and to provide only a default
> >> router to the host
> >> (which is done through the router advertisements). In the
> >> case that the
> >> router is not the best choice for a specific route, the
> >> router will  send
> >> an ICMP redirect message to the corresponding host, to
> inform about a
> >> better router for this route.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Martin
> >>
> >>
> >> --On Dienstag, Januar 15, 2002 20:05:56 +0530 Vijayabhaskar A K
> >> <vijayak@india.hp.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have gone through the dhcpv6 22 spec.
> >> > I felt that, static route option (option 33 in RFC 2132)
> is missing.
> >> > which is useful for routing. Can we include this option
> >> > also in the spec?
> >> > thanks and regards
> >> > Vijay
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > dhcwg mailing list
> >> > dhcwg@ietf.org
> >> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg