Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option

Ted Lemon <mellon@nominum.com> Mon, 23 August 2004 15:20 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA15894; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:20:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BzGCT-0001M5-NX; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:53:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BzFq6-0005w6-OV for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:30:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA12030 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:30:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.186.142]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BzFqL-0006AH-02 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:30:42 -0400
Received: from [10.0.1.19] (dpc6935208055.direcpc.com [69.35.208.55]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F981B226B; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:30:05 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <y7vd61iqk52.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
References: <y7vacxc5f3r.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <20040803171447.GA27805@sverresborg.uninett.no> <4.3.2.7.2.20040803135851.02af6cb0@flask.cisco.com> <y7vn01ax2d4.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <y7vd61iqk52.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP; format=flowed
Message-Id: <EBBCE159-F510-11D8-AE27-000A95D9C74C@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Re: one more comment about the lifetime option
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:30:03 -0400
To: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?SklOTUVJIFRhdHV5YSAvIBskQj9ATEBDIzpIGyhC?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Aug 23, 2004, at 5:27 AM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> We should also restrict the position where the lifetime option can
> appear: it should only be able to appear at the "top level" of option
> hierarchy.

I think this is a good idea.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg