Received: from optimus.ietf.org (www.iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA09418 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:11:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIbdT-0004GG-Sa for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:05:10 -0400 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3RN57WS016376 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:05:07 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIbWr-0003La-8b for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:58:17 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08968 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:58:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIbWm-000043-6G for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:58:12 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIbW6-0007lz-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:57:31 -0400 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIbVL-0007ec-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:56:43 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIbOs-0002FQ-Vn; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:50:02 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BIbKc-0001Hr-9L for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:45:38 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08472 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:45:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BIbKX-0006Wu-6b for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:45:33 -0400 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BIbJp-0006PU-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:44:49 -0400 Received: from chimera.incognito.com ([206.172.52.66]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BIbJ5-0006Eo-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:44:03 -0400 Received: from homerdmz.incognito.com ([206.172.52.116] helo=HOMER.incognito.com.) by chimera.incognito.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BIbId-0000ON-04; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:43:35 -0700 Received: by homer.incognito.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:43:04 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Kostur, Andre" To: "'Jake Howerton'" , dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Option 60 VCI Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:43:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C42CA9.00C14DA0" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C42CA9.00C14DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" You don't really mention in what way you want to separate your devices. The cable modems are easily identifiable since they are following the DOCSIS specifications, and DOCSIS mandates that option 60 must be of a certain form. As far as I know there is no general requirement. From a DHCP standpoint there is no requirement that option 60 is sent at all. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jake Howerton [mailto:jake@capanis.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 1:30 PM > To: dhcwg@ietf.org > Subject: [dhcwg] Option 60 VCI > > > Do all clients transmit option 60? I am trying to separate > devices on my > network and am looking to find out if linksys and other > consumer routers > transmit option 60 as well as consumer and enterprise Aps > like the Orinoco > AP1000. I have my cable modems working with this method. If > there are any > other effective ways to do this, suggestions are appreciated. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C42CA9.00C14DA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: [dhcwg] Option 60 VCI

You don't really mention in what way you want to = separate your devices.  The cable modems are easily identifiable = since they are following the DOCSIS specifications, and DOCSIS mandates = that option 60 must be of a certain form.  As far as I know there = is no general requirement.  From a DHCP standpoint there is no = requirement that option 60 is sent at all.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jake Howerton [mailto:jake@capanis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 1:30 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] Option 60 VCI
>
>
> Do all clients transmit option 60?  I am = trying to separate
> devices on my
> network and am looking to find out if linksys = and other
> consumer routers
> transmit option 60 as well as consumer and = enterprise Aps
> like the Orinoco
> AP1000.  I have my cable modems working = with this method.  If
> there are any
> other effective ways to do this, suggestions = are appreciated.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C42CA9.00C14DA0-- _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg