[dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly be IPv4-specific?
Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Thu, 08 April 2004 23:09 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA05732 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 19:09:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBieD-00040k-Fv for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:09:25 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i38N9PT7015414 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 19:09:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBieD-00040X-BV for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:09:25 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA05656 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 19:09:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBie9-0001uW-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:09:21 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBhmb-0003iM-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:14:03 -0400
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBfnN-00031k-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:06:41 -0400
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BBffE-0007pI-G4 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:58:16 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBff0-00054D-Gc; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:58:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBfen-00053L-Ky for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:57:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15444 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:57:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBfel-0002Be-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:57:47 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BB24W-0001wB-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 21:41:45 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BB0tZ-0002Yc-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 20:26:21 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2004 17:23:34 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i370PoCC002985 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:25:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rdroms-w2k01.cisco.com (che-vpn-cluster-1-83.cisco.com [10.86.240.83]) by flask.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AHK36571; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:25:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040406202408.02cc4ed8@flask.cisco.com>
X-Sender: rdroms@flask.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 20:24:54 -0400
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly be IPv4-specific?
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Bert Wijnen: Discuss: - It seems to be implicitly IPv4 specific without explaining/justifying why and uses "IP address" to mean IPv4 addresses only. Do we not want them to either be IPv4/v6 agnostic or to be specific in stating that they are IPv4 only if such is the case and justified? _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly be … Ralph Droms
- RE: [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly… Bernie Volz
- Re: [dhcwg] Should the leasequery spec explicitly… Kim Kinnear