IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 11 September 2012 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7D221F87EA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.261
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.262, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6D1U6ShMr7Jb for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og123.obsmtp.com (exprod7og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F4221F87BC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUE9Xg+9ighHnYrkDXaQUUs0gm0TzGAbk@postini.com; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:23:48 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAD01B8540 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570FA19005C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:23:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:23:47 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure
Thread-Index: AQHNggw8RB5j9kIDsUGrLGIrni1hs5eFuqYAgAAZeQA=
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:23:46 +0000
Message-ID: <7508B5C2-6DA0-41DD-9637-17F5C7A00308@nominum.com>
References: <AE6C424A-7BA3-4239-817E-44BE0B71D3DD@nominum.com> <BA6CAF38-5AFD-4998-A268-25AE1142BFCB@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <BA6CAF38-5AFD-4998-A268-25AE1142BFCB@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <A860855E4F3F6B4C8E667A6C21886B1A@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:23:49 -0000

On Sep 11, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> We didn't actually get a huge response to this, so it may have been premature of me to approve the draft submission.     But we have at least three working group participants who think it's a good idea, and nobody reacted in horror.   If, reading this, you feel that it was a mistake for me to approve the draft, please say so.   Otherwise, let's get to work on it!

Med pointed out that I was in fact not mistaken about this draft being the one that I'd done a consensus evaluation on.   The reason for my confusion was the badly broken Mail.app, not a lack of response—when I did a search for this this morning, I only found three related messages, but when I did it yesterday I found five.   Frustrating.   Sorry for the useless noise.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email