Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28

Mathias Samuelson <Mathias.Samuelson@nominum.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <Mathias.Samuelson@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96441A020E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DL_dRahNQ2eN for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6491F1A0217 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68B81B8215 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:53:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD9C190043; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:53:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:53:06 -0800
From: Mathias Samuelson <Mathias.Samuelson@nominum.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
Thread-Index: AQHPJ2ldslM4NZ0h602QxLy7DpfOd5rFaEoAgArAU4A=
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:53:07 +0000
Message-ID: <F8F7F4C3-8EA7-4E21-B4CB-2982EEFD4DF6@nominum.com>
References: <52FA85BB.7090003@gmail.com> <52FA8A77.9000504@gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AEAB9B8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AEAB9B8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EC67634DDAFEDF49BDD988CD7FE91EB7@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/JeSrvwA7jmzTtQV9kxDyXk55duE
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:53:14 -0000

I read this a while back and support advancing it.

Similarly to the v4 ditto, I do apologize for coming in late. Feel free not to count me in. :)

Mathias

On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> Reminder that this WGLC is outstanding.
> 
> We need feedback in order to determine whether to advance this document.
> 
> - Bernie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tomek Mrugalski
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:39 PM
> To: dhcwg
> Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00 - Respond by Feb. 28
> 
> We have adopted two active leasequery drafts after Vancouver meeting.
> There was moderate interest in that work during adoption call, but we never saw any discussions about them on the ML. Since authors confidence in those proposals are high due to existing implementations, they have requested WGLC.
> 
> After a quick discussion between chairs, we have decided to go ahead with the WGLC, hoping that it will trigger some reviews and discussion.
> Please make no mistake - those drafts need reviews and comments. A simple "I support this" followed with couple +1s will not do do the trick here.
> 
> This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00. Please send your comments by Feb. 28th. Note that although both documents are very similar, they are separate drafts and are going through separate WGLCs.
> If you support this work, make sure that you clearly state which draft (v4, v6 or both) you support. Each WGLC will be assessed independently.
> 
> Finally, I'd also remind you that we are looking for volunteers to do the shepherding work. Please let us know if you'd like to be a shepherd for one of those documents. It is not a difficult task, but some prior IETF experience is necessary. As a shepherd, you can get unique insight into the WGLC process and better exposure to how IESG works. Having such an experience can be useful with moving your own draft forward faster.
> 
> Bernie & Tomek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg