From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] sunset4 & DHCP4o6
Thread-Index: AQHQw6cFqJdubxs2LUiJNRe+1s13tJ3lyH5L
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:25:08 +0000
Message-ID: <613E7178-6C25-43F9-B355-0F47D468ABA2@cisco.com>
References: <201507211117.t6LBH4Cr022993@givry.fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <201507211117.t6LBH4Cr022993@givry.fdupont.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/KJRIifl9OYgH6-dsgiNpHePG2YA>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] sunset4 & DHCP4o6
Precedence: list

In some cases we may have "special" knowledge. But we don't actively collec=
t news of product/opensource annoucements nor do we think that is an IETF /=
 dhc co-chair responsibilty.

You can certainly send out such announcement or request to collect & post t=
his information.

There are cases where we may actively solicit implementation information, s=
uch as when trying to advance standards or document other implementation da=
ta.

- Bernie (from iPad)

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> w=
rote:
>=20
> Looking the slides of the "Gap analysis" at the sunset4+v6ops session
> of IETF 93 it seems a good idea to collect and publish an implementation
> summary for DHCP4o6 (i.e., the list of available and planned implementati=
ons
> of DHCP4o6 clients and servers). IMHO a typical job for the DHC WG.
>=20
> Regards
>=20
> Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
>=20
> PS: please post the result in the sunset4 mailing list (i.e., where users
> should be :-).
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg