IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] [homenet] PPP, DHCPv6 and Prefix Delegation

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Tue, 19 November 2013 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3393B1ADF51; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:07:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.541
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FRT_ADULT2=1.474, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FRT_ADULT2=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e06Rp7L1VEtQ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:07:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED661A802D; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:07:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2580; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384862862; x=1386072462; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=R7y++NC2qgk6WWqB2S4+oSz6SQlKKVh/KFY8dFw3qUA=; b=lVTE9z2igFugZw1RH9Bh1LR8KtPPkZ96wxg2TFKFqo9NUQei00Bme5/e dkqahhXGZlNYju1V60XenSo5Y7Aw5pd+LGOQkB63rfr93xnJnhveuOUBm 0UVtGN9hpVCAZC3oWLHAmC8R1wNyuKHPbb6kt3pHYNq2LKr6ogdAU7gT4 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAEdTi1KtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgwc4wBKBIBZ0giYBAQQBAQFrCxACAQgEAQkxByEGCxQRAgQOBYdvAw8NuHYNiTkTBIxjgnAEB4MggRIDlieBa4xVhTiDKA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,729,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217";a="575326"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2013 12:07:41 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAJC7ebm003945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:07:40 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.192]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:07:40 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Athanasios Douitsis <aduitsis@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] [homenet] PPP, DHCPv6 and Prefix Delegation
Thread-Index: AQHO5Ri7/ZQxPbNQZU2e9Sr4HhC+RposdbHZ
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:07:40 +0000
Message-ID: <70913413-2B68-4703-84E3-F7CC47E1A0E2@cisco.com>
References: <11836.1384276281@sandelman.ca> <CAKOT5Ko2OO=U_0jADb6R88JiFh59BLDSe4P0haqgaBr2M7HobA@mail.gmail.com> <3673.1384528283@sandelman.ca> <CAKOT5Kpp0dCqbZyFzwtjTh9UJ5hGHUMN0ZGQHUL35+mkO9VRrA@mail.gmail.com> <CABT9mj-rw5bsVa7UAiraxu-U2t1QGqPronYj3Fx6ZxoPWo0Zow@mail.gmail.com>, <CABT9mj-sQbfiNyfUZDxVmCg7SYWaJXcp+pNbyUSj64iFSA5fuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABT9mj-sQbfiNyfUZDxVmCg7SYWaJXcp+pNbyUSj64iFSA5fuA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_709134132B68470384E3F7CC47E1A0E2ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [homenet] PPP, DHCPv6 and Prefix Delegation
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:07:49 -0000

Why would it ever be copied into that option? That makes no sense to me.

- Bernie (from iPad)

On Nov 19, 2013, at 6:16 AM, "Athanasios Douitsis" <aduitsis@gmail.com<mailto:aduitsis@gmail.com>> wrote:



(i.e. have a configuration option to use the Framed-IPv6-Prefix value in the prefix exclude option instead of an RA)

Correction, the above is incorrect, as has been rightly pointed.

Are there any cases where the Framed-IPv6-Prefix value will not be copied as-is in the OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE value?




_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email