IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dhcwg] WGLC summary on draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-04: Passed

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Mon, 10 November 2014 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021C21A8A63 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:26:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPMKgrXObyb8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com (mail-pd0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9354E1A8A51 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id v10so7846527pde.22 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:26:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=69RJR4AjRsGMO6DHz4AIR+3aBQ4/cdhdhgYsdyCa9vg=; b=tsRHsyF0c6cL9t4VagSVsG924X2oz9yYPUhZL3iRadVYDSqFYQLsroJY95cjS3v7Ti WiUPgRe3dh8NhHm5bwawUmDM/z5vz+mnT5GlJ0nLQ3WN7MdRthfOJrZeE2asdAClrP4T amdjJhCnaDbDpTSy57MUfzd+IcEly3V8S8GSz1tqQZiqCA/BRx/YeoXXrvtF8o7TiNk8 fzEK4SiJCvwKYl2HSSHUp0BeOzXwScexeJd2DNi8rBgd7Jd+M3UdYZ8H9G44Zs1wkU+G taB+s2OPgk0tf122zMwNfc6yT2jqes+uRlTn4gZs1qds70rsPIH84GVlSKmIwVjMdEZ1 RjXQ==
X-Received: by 10.69.20.42 with SMTP id gz10mr31784333pbd.91.1415629561889; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from voyager2.local (rrcs-173-197-107-11.west.biz.rr.com. [173.197.107.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gm11sm16689259pbd.63.2014.11.10.06.26.00 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5460CAF7.9070804@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 04:25:59 -1000
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B6F6882@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B6F6882@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/KaOXrENqNKRzySP135HkSI0pQdw
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC summary on draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-04: Passed
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:26:04 -0000

On 26/10/14 12:11, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> This message starts the (short) DHC working group last call to advance
> "Secure DHCPv6", draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-04, document as a Standards
> Track (Proposed Standard) RFC. The authors believe that this version is
> ready. We had a WGLC earlier (May 2014 for the -02 version) and there
> were some comments, so this is primarily to assure that those comments
> were addressed.
> 
> Please send your comments by November 3rd, 2014. If you do not feel this
> document should advance, please state your reasons why.
Bernie and I discussed this work group last call and consider it
successful. There were couple issues raised, but they are mostly
editorial in nature. One more revision is needed and it will be ready to go.

Authors, please address the comments and upload -05.

Bernie & Tomek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email