Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-20
Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Thu, 25 October 2001 15:20 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA21432 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:20:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id LAA09401 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:20:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA06859; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:07:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA06840 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:07:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from funnel.cisco.com (funnel.cisco.com [161.44.168.79]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA19775 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:07:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rdroms-w2k.cisco.com ([161.44.150.51]) by funnel.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id KAA11932; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:02:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011025094843.038b1238@funnel.cisco.com>
X-Sender: rdroms@funnel.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:00:56 -0400
To: jason@compsoc.man.ac.uk
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-20
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20011022153543.J29607@mrbusy.compsoc.man.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
The consensus was that including the change log in the doc was confusing to the ever-growing group of new readers. I do have a list of issues that the new draft addresses, which is based on the list of issues we developed at the DHC WG meeting in London... - Ralph At 03:35 PM 10/22/2001 +0100, Jason Williams wrote: >Good afternoon... > >Having breathlessly rushed to download and print off the lovely draft 20 >of your DHCPv6 specification, I can't help noticing it seems to be short a >change log - was there a reason for this? > >Thanks. > >-- > jason@khendon.org.uk _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-20 Jason Williams
- Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-20 Ralph Droms